MIDDLESEX SESSIONS, Tuesday, March 7
(Before Sir W.CURTIS, Bart., and a full Bench of Magistrates)
John Jacobs was indicted, charged with keeping a disorderly house in New
Norfolk-street, Commercial-road ... the prosecution had been instituted by the
"Society for
the Prevention of Juvenile prostitution." ... established some short
time since for the laudable purpose of especially directing its object towards
the suppression and prevention of juvenile prostitution. The society did not
attempt to grapple with the great mass of profligacy and delinquency which
prevailed to so lamentable an extent in the metropolis, but confined its
exertions to the rescue of those young girls, children of tender years, from the
wretched scenes of vice and depravity which were momentarily to be met with in
the houses of the description of which the defendant was accused of being the
proprietor. The case he should have to present to them upon that occasion was
simply this. The society about 12 months since had obtained the requisite
evidence to prosecute the defendant, but as was often the vase where it was
everybody's business it was nobody's business, the matter had not been proceeded
with. The defendant, however, had been remonstrated with, when he boldly and
impudently set them at defiance; and as a prosecution was not commenced at the
time he continued to pursue his disgusting and demoralizing practices until the
attention of the society was called to him by a young girl, of the name of Mary
Ann Shields, of the age of 16 years, who appealed to them for protection, at the
same moment supplicating their assistance with a view of rescuing her from the
horrid state of life into which she had been entrapped, and in continuance of
which she had been compelled to remain by the defendant and his wife. . . . .
.
The learned counsel then called Mary Ann Shields, who said
that she should be 16 years of age next July. She had formerly worked at a
factory at Haggerstone, but had quitted her employment by the solicitation of a
fellow work-girl of the name of Maris. She was by that girl taken to a house
kept by a woman of the name of Abrahams, with whom she continued as long as 14
months. At the expiration of that period she was taken to No.9, New
Norfolk-street, Commercial-road, a house of ill-fame, of which the defendant and
his wife were the proprietors. The defendant was the uncle of the Mrs. Abrahams
to whom she had been at first taken. It was in the summer when she went there.
There were four other young girls kept there, - one Betsey Brisall, aged 13; one
Maria, who was 18, and the two others were about 16 each. They were all dressed
up in the evening, and sent out to walk the Commercial-road. The defendant told
them to look about , and speak to every man they met. A young woman, the sister
of Mrs. Abrahams, went out with them to see that they did not run away. They
brought gentlemen home with them. She herself, by the orders of the defendant
and his wife did so. They had frequently taken home several different gentlemen
in the course of an evening - she herself had taken home as many as eight or
nine gentlemen in one night. The money which was presented to them by their
visiters they were compelled to hand over to the defendant and his wife, who, if
they suspected that the whole amount was not given
to them, would cause the girls to be searched with the view of possessing
themselves of every farthing. The defendant and his wife clothed and fed the
girls who were in their employ, but did not allow them any money. She had upon
one occasion made an attempt to run away, but was caught and taken back to the
defendant's house by his niece. On their arrival there the defendant, having
heard from his niece what she had done, commenced beating her. The defendant was
frequently in the habit of striking his girls, but his wife never did so. She
remembered the little girl Brisall being sent away by Mrs. Jacobs because the
policeman would not let her walk the Commercial-road. The girl Maria effected
her escape. She had heard Mrs. Jacobs tell the nice to look about and to bring
home young girls as she did not want old ones. The prisoner had said that if any
of the girls attempted to run away he would have them transported for taking
away his clothes. The usual hour for them to return home was 1 or 2 o'clock in
the morning; but if the niece made any complaint of either of them they were
told they should remain out until 5 o'clock in the morning.
Cross-examined - Was now under the protection of the
society. Was at Abraham's 14 months, with the exception of the five weeks she
was at Jacobs's. She had not seen her mother for the 14 months. For some reasons
she was sent over to Mrs. Abraham's again and that person, after some time, in
consequence of frequent importunities on her part, consented to let her run
away, provided she did not tell the defendant that she had connived at her
escape. Upon one occasion prior to this she had run away, but was brought back
to Mrs. Abraham's by a policeman. After she had released herself from the
clutches of the defendant and his family, she wandered about for the purpose and
with the hope of meeting her mother, whom she has not seen since the moment she
quitted the factory, and it was in one of those rambles that she encountered and
entered into conversation with the person, a former acquaintance, who suggested
that she should apply to the society in Fenchurch-street for assistance. James
White, a policeman, K 285, lives in the same street where the defendant lived at
No.9, New Norfolk-street. The defendant left in December as soon as the bill was
found; had seen a number of young girls go in and out of the defendant's house
with gentlemen. Prior to the last year there was one called a "touter,"
of the name of Hannah, who could not have been more than 12 years of age. The
girls were in the habit, in the day time, of leaning out of the windows when
dressed in an indecent manner, and nodding to the gentlemen as they passed, and
they frequently used disgusting language.
Cross-examined. - Had not noticed the use of that offensive
discourse since Hannah had left, which was before last year. Alex. Pike, a
resident inhabitant of the street, stated that he lived the next door but one to
the house which the defendant had occupied. The witness confirmed the testimony
of those who had preceded him as to the character of the house. Mr. ADOLPHUS
addressed the jury on behalf of the defendant, who he said was labouring from
the effects of severe bodily disease, and advertised to the character of the
society by which the prosecution was promoted. The CHAIRMAN told the jury that
they must arrive at their verdict from a consideration of the evidence, and not
be biased by any remarks which had been offered to them by the learned counsel,
either on the one side or the other. The jury instantly found the defendant
Guilty.
The CHAIRMAN, after consulting with his brother magistrates
told the defendant the Court would not conceal from him that they considered he
had been very properly convicted; and further the Court would inform him, that
they were determined to visit him with a severe punishment, and he hoped the
declaration would reach others who were following the same course of life as
that of which he had just been so justly convicted. The punishment it was
proposed to inflict upon him was very severe, for his offence called for a
severity of punishment, and hard labour would be added to the term of
imprisonment. If, however, it was discovered by the medical attendant of the
prison that his state of health and body was such as to render hard labour
improper, that gentleman would receive instructions to communicate the fact to
the visiting magistrates, who would order a commutation of the sentence in
respect to that portion of it. The sentence of the Court was that he should be
imprisoned in the House of Correction for the term of six months, and that he be
subjected to hard labour, and pay a fine of 20l. to the King, and be
further imprisoned until that fine be paid. Mr. BALLANTYNE then moved for a
warrant to issue against Maria Davis, against whom a true bill had just been
found for a similar offence.
The CHAIRMAN - Certainly.
The Times, March 8, 1837
HOUSES OF ILL FAME
Rosetta Goldsmith and Elizabeth Smith were indicted, charge
with a nuisance in keeping a house of ill-fame. Mr. PAYNE appeared for the
prosecution. The defendants pleaded "guilty."
The CHAIRMAN said, that the Court were very anxious for
certain reasons, to know all the particulars with respect to the house which had
been kept by the defendants; and therefore, inasmuch as it was important to
ascertain whether the parties who had been in the habit of using the house had
been girls of a tender age, or whether young girls lived therein, it was
necessary that some evidence should be laid before them with a view to a proper
apportionment of punishment. Mr. PAYNE then call two of the police force, who
stated that the house was one of ill-fame; that it was situated in Bull-court,
Goswell-street, in the parish of St. Luke; that they had seen as many as 20 or
30 couples go there in the course of a night; that the females were of ages from
16 to 30; that they had frequently heard the most disgusting language used
therein; and that many of the persons who had recourse to the house they knew to
be common thieves, several of whom had before and since been convicted of
various offences. The CHAIRMAN - What ages do you say these girls were.
Witness - Perhaps from the ages of 15 and 16, but not
younger.
The CHAIRMAN - Were there any of more tender years - 10, 11
or 12?
Witness - No; I should think there were not any younger than
14.
The CHAIRMAN - It is necessary that the Court should
ascertain this fact, as they will be guided very much in reference to it in the
judgment they may pass upon these defendants. . . . . if it had been
proved that young girls of a tender age had been permitted by them to come to
their house, the defendants would have been made to pay a penalty of a least
four times the extent of that with which they were about to be visited . . . .
The commission of that crime, however, did not appear to attach to the
defendants who were then before them, and the Court consequently had modified
their sentence, which was, that the defendants should be imprisoned in the House
of Correction and be kept to hard labour for the space of four months.
The Times, April 6, 1837
see also Sinks of London Laid Open - click here
Houses in which Prostitutes Lodge. - I must now briefly notice the
domiciliary arrangements of the various classes of independent
prostitutes. These are so influenced - like our own homes - by the
resources and taste of the individual, have so little local colour, and
are besides so exceedingly well understood among men, that accurate
pictures at any length would be as superfluous as fancy sketches
would be out of place.
If we enter the house, or apartment, in a suburban neighbourhood
- where, perhaps, the occupier of the shop below is non-resident - of
the first-class prostitute, we find it neat or slovenly, plain or elegant,
according to its mistress's income, the manners and tastes of her
admirers, and her tendency to sobriety or the reverse. We have cheap
and respectable lodgings, in reputable quarters of the town, wherein
young and pleasing women of unambitious temperament will reside
for years, receiving no visitors at home, anxiously guarding their
characters there, and from choice involving themselves in no more
sin than will serve to eke out their modest earnings, or provide a
slender maintenance which they may have been precluded from
earning in their normal walk of life by the first false step. This numerous band, who, keenly alive to their painful position, willing
to do better, unwilling - even for the sake of those wondrous magnets, dress and admiration - to join the ranks of the flashy and dissipated, are the proper objects of sympathy. London holds hundreds
of them, not too far gone for true, permanent reform; and success
would richly reward a far larger expenditure than can be expected
at the hands of private charity.
These present us with the least degraded aspect of prostitution,
but both in the western and eastern districts, especially in the latter,
are to be found a great number of lodging-houses crowded together,
in certain neighbourhoods of no fair fame, and called generically, in
police reports, notorious brothels', devoted especially to the reception of prostitutes. They are clean or dirty - comparatively well or
ill-furnished, according to the capital embarked in them. From
houses in St John's Wood, Brompton, and Pimlico, to the atrocious
slums of Blackfriars and Whitechapel, there are, of course, many
steps, and with the rent at which the proprietors offer their apartments varies, of course, the style of the sub-tenants. In point of
morality, there is, naturally, no difference; and in the general internal propriety, little enough. The most decently-minded woman who
takes up her quarters in a circle of prostitutes, and, though she has
a private apartment in which to receive visitors, betakes herself for
society and distraction (as do always the inmates of such houses) to
the common kitchen, must speedily fall to the common level. She
finds that modesty and propriety are considered offensive hypocrisy.
Liquor, in the intervals of business, is insisted upon by her companions and by the landlady, who makes a profit on the supply. Her
company is sought for novelty's sake when she is a newcomer, and
her absence or reserve is considered insulting when she is fairly
settled; so, if she had any previous idea of keeping herself to herself,
it is very soon dissipated. She finds, when she has no male visitors, a
sort of communism established in her rooms, which she can only
avoid by resorting to the common hall in the dirty kitchen. There is
no making head against this practice in lodging-houses generally,
and hence the remarkable uniformity in the habits, manners, dress,
and demeanour of the three or four sub-sections of their inhabitants.
They are usually during the day, unless called upon by their
followers, or employed in dressing, to be found, dishevelled, dirty,
slipshod and dressing-gowned, in this kitchen, where the mistress
keeps her table-d'hôte. Stupid from beer, or fractious from gin, they
swear and chatter brainless stuff all day, about men and millinery,
their own schemes and adventures, and the faults of others of the
sisterhood. As a heap of rubbish will ferment, so surely will a number
of unvirtuous women thus collected deteriorate, whatever their
antecedents or good qualities previously to their being herded under
the semi-tyranny of this kind of lodging-house. In such a household,
all decency, modesty, propriety, and conscience must, to preserve
harmony and republican equality, be planed down, and the woman
hammered out, not by the practice of her profession or the company
of men, but by association with her own sex and class, to the dead
level of harlotry.
From such houses issue the greater number of the dressy females
with whom the public are familiar as the frequenters of the Hay-
market and the night-houses. Here they seem to rally, the last thing,
from other parts of the town, when general society, and the most
decent as well as lowest classes of prostitutes, are alike housed for the
night. Here they throw the last allures of fascination to the prowler
and the drunkard - hence wander to their lairs, disgusted and weary
if alone - noisy and high-spirited if chance has lent them company.
To form an idea of the sort of life these women lead, we must listen
to the evidence given at police courts. I extract the following from a
leader in The Times for April 10, 1858, on evidence taken at the trial
of an Italian, Giovanni Lani, who murdered one of these women for
the sake of her jewelry:
The house appears to have been well tenanted, and was, no doubt, a
lucrative investment for Madame Levi's capital. Three or four women
lodged in the house. They provided their own dresses and jewelry.'
Madame Silvestre was one of these lodgers. She was not a femme galante, but still had a habit of walking the streets late at night. She
lived in the front room of the second floor with her friend M. Théophile
Mouton, by whose commercial profits she was supported. Madame
Silvestre returned home on the night in question at one o'clock, and
Héloise Thaubin, leaving the prisoner in her room, came down and
had supper with her friend in the room where M. Mouton was in bed.
About half-past two o'clock she went back to her own room, and at this
seasonable hour Madame Silvestre, wishing for amusement, went up
and borrowed a book from Héloise, which the prisoner, in his shirt,
handed out at the door. I then,' she says, went to bed, got up the next
morning about twelve, and had breakfast at one.' Madame Silvestre,
though not a femme galante, not only walked the streets, but was visited
by male friends. When this occurred M. Mouton was generally out
at his work.' This work M. Théophile Mouton tells us was the business
of a commission agent. My business consists of selling every article
that is intrusted to me. I have no offices, and never receive any business
letters, because I am only a clerk, and have no business on my own
account. I formerly used to deal in jewelry. The articles I sold were
gilt or false jewelry.' Such is the account M. Mouton gives of his own
professional pursuits. Besides these persons another man named
Disher lived in the house. He carried on the business of a tailor. A
woman lived with him who was called Mrs Disher'. Mr. and Mrs.
Disher quarrelled on the night of the 23rd of February, and it was in
consequence of the latter leaving her room and sitting on the stairs all
night that she was able to hear the deceased's groans, and to recognize
Lani as he came down laden with the murdered woman's spoils.
We have given this brief sketch of the house and its inmates, because
No. 8, Arundel Court, was probably only a specimen of scores of other
houses tenanted by this class of foreign adventuresses. They all seemed
to have lived together with as little decency as brute animals. The last
vestige of modesty which belongs even to the fallen seems to have been
erased from the character of these cold, hard, money-grasping prostitutes and their paramours. They are well off, they wear their watches
and chains and four rings on two fingers', they are proud of showing
their jewelry', and they refuse 10 francs with disdain. The gentlemen
lead an easy life. When the deceased's bedroom was broken open and
her corpse found M. Théophile Mouton had not long returned home. 'He had been out for a walk with Mr Disher during the day, and he
brought home something for dinner.' In short, we are introduced to a
community which is existing in the most self-complacent manner on
the wages of infamy, and in which each individual has the air of
considering that he or she is doing nothing in the world to be ashamed of.
The keepers of the old dress houses were mostly females of extreme avarice, and often ferocious manners - the former sharpened
by the unprincipled atmosphere in which they lived, and the latter
by the necessity of preserving discipline among their tenants and dependents. They were ordinarily persons who had been bred to the
business from youth, as relatives or old servants of their predecessors. Such an establishment was considered to be too lucrative to
permit the idea of its dispersion upon the death or retirement of a
proprietor; and as a matter of fact, the lease, goodwill, and stock-in-
trade of a brothel were, in such an event, disposed of like those of
any other lodging-house. Women who had been themselves kept or
frequented by men of property were sometimes able to found or
purchase one or more of them. A large share of their tenants' earnings passed through their hands, and a liberal portion always remained there. They were highly paid for liquors and eatables they
procured on account of male visitors; and several instances are well
authenticated of their having left ample means behind them, or
having retired wealthy into private life. Things are, doubtless,
changed.
It is to be feared, however, as we see, that there still exists a system
analogous to that of woman farming, and resembling it only too
closely, and that the dress house has merely given place to an institution too similar, viz., the dress lodging. Still the difference, though
at first sight it may appear but one of name, is really one of degree.
The dress girl was, as we have seen, the serf - the white slave of her
proprietor, dependent on the latter for food and clothes and shelter,
having no property of her own, or power over her own actions, but
forced to fulfil the evil will of another by whom the fruits of her
infamy were received. No property, no rights, no will, no hope - not
one attribute, in short, of independent existence; the right alone
remained to suffer and decay, while wretches more vile even than
herself grew rich by her ruin. The dress lodger, like the dress girl,
receives from the owner of the house in which she resides, clothes,
and board and lodging, but the wages of her guilt are paid to herself.
She obtains from the man whom she has enticed to the house as
much money as she can, and the proprietor's interest in the booty
amounts either to a part or the whole, according as her skill in extortion is small or great. Like the dress girl, she is exposed to the tender
mercies of a brutal tyrant, who expects the surrender to herself of the
gains of her corruption, but to her is, at least, conceded the acknowledgment of separate rights and independent existence.
Introducing Houses. - The establishments of certain procuresses
vulgarly called 'introducing houses', ... are worth notice as the
leading centres of the more select circles of prostitution here. Unobtrusive, and dependent upon great exterior decency for a good
connexion, they concern us as little from a sanitary as from a police
point of view, but are not without an influence upon the morals of the
highest society. Their existence depends upon the co-operation and
discretion of various subordinate accomplices, and on the patronage
of some of the many wealthy, indolent, sensual men of London, who
will pay any premium for assurance against social discredit and
sanitary damage. Disease is therefore rarely traceable to such a
source, and notoriety and scandal almost as seldom; although impolitic economy on the gentleman's part, or indiscreet bearing
towards any of the characters among whom he cannot be a hero, will
induce them occasionally to hunt him and his follies into daylight, as
a warning to others, not against the lusts of the flesh, but against
sentiments which horse-leeches might consider illiberal. He usually
obtains for his money security, comfort, and a superior class of
prostitute, who is, according to his knowledge of the world or desires,
presented to him as maid, wife, or widow - British, or imported
direct from foreign parts. The female obtains fairly liberal terms,
either directly from the paramour, or from the entrepreneuse (who, of
course, takes good care of herself), the company of gentlemen, and,
when this is an object with her, unquestionable privacy. A number
of the first-class prostitutes have relations with these houses, and
are sent for as occasion and demand may arise. I have heard of one
establishment at which no female is welcome who has not some
particular accomplishment, as music or singing. I am told these
establishments are much more common in New York than in
London.
A stranger might be long in London. . . without hearing of, and
still longer without gaining access to, this aristocracy of brothels.
Their frequenters are often elderly, sometimes married, and generally men of exclusive sets, upon whom it would not be to the proprietor's interest to impose even unseen association with the stranger
or the roturier [commoner]. The leading persons in this line of
business, who keep up regular relations with certain men of fashion,
and sometimes means, make known to their clients their novel and
attractive wares, one might almost say, by circular. A. finds a note
at his club, telling him that a charming arrival, de la plus grande fraicheur [in the absolute bloom of youth], is on view at Madame
de L.'s. If he has no vacancy for a connexion, he may answer that a
mutual friend, C., a very proper man, will call on such and such a
day in --- road, or that Madame --- may drive the object round
to his rooms at such another time; but that he has no great fancy at
present for anything but a thoroughly warranted - in fact, an all-but
modest - person. All parties handle the affair with mock refinement.
Sometimes money passes direct, as third persons have to be arranged
with; at others, the broker, or procuress, ventures her capital, and
leaves recompense to the honour of her friends - some of whom, of
course, fleece her, others do what is considered fair, and now and
then may be so generous that she is, on the whole, perhaps, better off
than if she traded on strict cash principles only. The pungent
anecdotes which occur to me respecting such houses and their
frequenters, would, if properly disguised, go little way in proof of
their existence - which, by the way, must be patent enough to those
who habitually read law reports - and as their unvarnished recital
here would give my pages an air of levity quite foreign to my intentions, I must suppress them, and request the reader to take for
granted, for the purpose of this survey, the existence of these
superior haunts of London prostitution.
Accommodation Houses. - Accommodation houses for casual use
only, the maisons de passe [houses of call] of London, wherein permanent lodgers are not received, are diffused throughout the capital;
neither its wealth nor poverty exempting a district from their
presence. I have not, and I believe that no other person has, any
guide to their numbers or classification. I have seen various numerical estimates of these and other houses in print, some of them professing to be from public sources; but I attach in this respect little
value to even those I have obtained from the police, as their framers
seem neither to have settled for themselves or for the public the
precise meanings of terms they employ. In the restricted sense in
which I have employed the words accommodation house', I believe
their number is limited. Few persons to whom I have spoken are
now aware of more than four or five within two or three west end
parishes, and as they almost invariably name the same, I am
strengthened in my opinion that these lupanaria are few. It were
more desirable, indeed, that they should multiply than either class
of the brothel proper above described; or that clandestine prostitution should be largely carried on in houses devoted to legitimate
trades, and inhabited presumedly by modest females. The thorough
elasticity of prostitution is shown in this as well as other ways; that
there being a demand for more numerous and dispersed places of
transient accommodation than at present exists, within the last few
years numerous coffee-houses and legitimate taverns, at which in
former days no casual lodgers would have been admitted, without
scrutiny, now give accommodation of the kind, for the part openly,
or when not exactly so, on exhibition of a slight apology for travelling
baggage. This appears very clearly from the return for 1868, in
which, for the first time, these houses are noticed, and in which they
reach the important figure of 229. In addition to these coffee-shops,
there are many restaurants at which people can obtain private rooms
by ordering refreshments. Many abandoned women also are occupiers of houses, and though they do not receive lodgers, will, for a
consideration and by arrangement, permit their rooms to be made
use of by other women for immoral purposes. They naturally have
a large acquaintance among prostitutes of their own class, so that it
may be reasonably supposed that a large amount of illicit intercourse
is in this way carried on; at the same time these houses are so quietly
kept, that police supervision is, as regards them, impossible. The
number of houses in the occupation of prostitutes has, it is true,
materially decreased of late years, but is still considerable, Pimlico
being the chief centre around which these women congregate.
Formerly accommodation houses abounded, and were to be found
in all parts of the town, some streets being entirely filled with them.
Among others, I may mention Oxendon Street, close to the Hay-
market; the front doors of the houses in this street were habitually
left half open. King's Court was another locale in which several
houses had existed from time immemorial; the narrow thoroughfare
of Wych Street had also acquired an evil notoriety, the houses in this
street, though ostensibly shops, being in reality all used for purposes
of prostitution. Parish prosecutions have achieved the closing of
most of these dens of iniquity, and the police returns show that the
number of such houses throughout the metropolis has decreased to
132, against 649 in 1857, and 848 in 1841.
The few accommodation houses of London are generally thronged
with custom, and their proprietors are of the same order as, and perhaps make even more money than, those of the lodging-houses.
Their tariffs are various, and the accommodation afforded ranges
between luxury and the squalor of those ambiguous dens, half
brothel and half lodging-house, whose inhabitants pay their twopences nightly. I believe that disorder is rarely encountered or
courted by any casual frequenters of such places, and that in all of
them but the vilest of the vile, the proprietors would be for their
own sakes the last to countenance it, and the first to call in the aid of
the law. This prosecution by parishes has had the effect of increasing
the expense of using such of these houses as still exist. At the date
of the introduction of the former edition of this work, the average
sum charged for the hire of a room was about five shillings, but now
the sum exacted for similar accommodation is never less than ten
shillings, in the West End of London. In the East End and over the water, the numbers and the tariff remain as small as they were
twelve years ago.
William Acton, Prostitution, Considered in its Moral, Social and Sanitary Aspects, 2nd edition 1870
MARGARET DAY, aged 13, SUSAN DAY, aged 10, and KATE BREWER, aged 9, were brought by Mr. Stephenson of the Rescue of Young Children Reformatory and Refuge Union, under the provisions of the Industrial Schools Amendment Act, with the object of obtaining a magisterial order to remove them from immoral associations. It was shown that the children were living with their parents in a house of ill-fame in Macklin-street, Drury-lane, but it was not suggested that the parents led immoral lives. The Act, however, provided against "the lodging, living or residing" in a house occupied by women of the description mentioned. The children were removed to the workhouse pending the decision of the magistrate.
The Times, October 15, 1886
see also Henry Vigar-Harris in London at Midnight -click here
At BOW-STREET, THOMAS HOLLYMAN AND HENRIETTA HOLLYMAN, his wife, were charged, before Sir John Bridge, with keeping a disorderly house in Craven-street, Strand. Mr. Harry Wilson prosecuted on behalf of the vestry of St. Martin's-in-the-Fields. Prisoners were defended by Mr. Moyses. The prisoners kept what they described as a private hotel in the street named, but according to the prosecution - and this was supported by police evidence - they allowed their rooms to be used for improper purposes. It was proved that the male prisoner was fined ?40 at Bow-street a short time ago for allowing improper practices at the same house. Evidence was also given to show that he had undergone three months imprisonment for keeping a disorderly house in the neighbourhood of King's-cross. Sir John Bridge said there could be no doubt as to the guilt of the male prisoner. The Strand was infested with prostitutes and these proceedings were quite justified. These houses were a nuisance to the public and a shame to the neighbourhood. The man was fine ?10, and ordered to find two sureties in ?100 each to be of good behaviour for 12 months; in default three months' hard labour. The woman (who is suffering from cancer) was bound over in her own recognizances to come up for judgment if called upon and did not give up the house at once.
The Times, January 19, 1894
see
also 'Restaurants
and Hotels' in Life in West London - click here