CORRECT LIKENESS! ONLY A
SHILLING!
"ONLY a shilling, sir! — c'rect likeness, frame included! done in one minute !"
We defy any pedestrian to walk leisurely between the breakfast hour and
sunset, along any frequented thoroughfare in London, without having the above
brief sentence drummed upon the tympanum of his ear in a charming variety of
tone and accent. Now it is vociferously announced with the gusto of an inventor
who has just discovered an extraordinary secret, and is driven forth
by some irresistible impulse to shout his Eureka in the streets ; anon it is
breathed into your ear in a kind of confidential whisper, by a man with unctuous
epidermis and a hooked nose, who holds in one hand a specimen, and with the
other retains you by the button with the familiarity of an old acquaintance, and
who, instead of saying "Done in one minute," says, " Dud id vod biddit ;" and
again it is bawled, like a costermonger's cry, in as mat- ter-of-fact a way as
though it were "taters three poun' tuppens."
Sometimes the tariff is even lower than a shilling. Your "c'rect likeness,
frame included," is offered for sixpence; and in the galleries of art in
Cowcross, Whitechapel, and Bethnal Green the figure is even halved again, and
you may be done as low as threepence.
Surely the depths of popular vanity and self-esteem were never so profoundly
fathomed as they have been and still are by the photographic plummet. All the
world has its correct likeness now, from the "oldest inhabitant" to the babe in
long clothes. Of the two and a half millions of faces in London, it is likely
that the odd half million would outnumber those who have never sat to the
photographer's camera : how many have sat twice, thrice, ten times over is a
question not likely to be answered. Our own Betty, who is forty if she is a day,
has been "done for sixpence" five times within our conizance, and one can but
guess what may be the case with Betties twenty years younger.
The entire aspect of the shop-world of London has undergone a material
change since Mr. Archer invented the collodion process. The
photographers' "cards" (which is the technical name for their show-boards)
occupy at this moment, it is our opinion, taking the metropolis throughout,
about as much space as the placards of the bill-sticker, with this notable
difference, that they are always placed in the sight level, and it is next to
impossible to miss one of them. There is a universal "great exhibition" of
portraits always open — portraits of the great uncelebrated, done in lead-colour
; and meanwhile the "cards" of the miniature painters, which used to line both
sides of the way from Charing Cross to Aldgate, and from the Edgware Road to
Fleet Ditch, have disappeared. The time-honoured inscription, "In this style,
one guinea," has given place to an inscription tantamount to the shilling
temptation quoted above.
It is on record — at any rate we remember reading the tragedy in the "Times"
newspaper — that one of the first miniature-painters who . saw a photographic
portrait, went home astounded, and incontinently hanged himself in his studio.
The example was not generally followed by his brethren: they bided their time,
and ultimately reaped the reward of their patience and fortitude : what
threatened at first to prove their ruin and annihilation, has proved instead
their safety and indefinite multiplication. They took to photography, learned
the collodion process, and, producing heads by the hundred a week, found their
account it. At first it was only the popular miniature-painters—those whose
exhibition gallery were the door-posts, and open entries of Oxford Street and
the Strand — who did this ; but gradually men of higher standing and greater
pretensions began to do the same ; some of them blended their old art with the
new, but others abandoned the old altogether, and set about improving or
developing the capabilities of the new. What is the case now? Go into the
miniature-room of the Royal Academy, in this year of Grace '59, and see how many
miniature painters exhibit, compared with the number who exhibited seven years
ago. The fact that stares you in the face is just this : that photography has
annihilated miniature-painting, with the exception of the very highest walk of
that department of art. People will not pay a high price for anything short of
first-rate excellence, while light-pictures are to be had, for a few guineas at
the utmost, surpassing in fidelity all the efforts of the painter's art, and
wanting only in colour.
It was the discovery of what are called positives on glass, and which made
their appearance but a few years back, which created and fed the demand for
popular photographs. There was a prejudice among skilled photographers against
these productions, and they cried them down as unworthy of the profession ; but
they were faithful in point of likeness, they could be executed in two or three
minutes, and consequently they were cheap. Cheapness carried the day; they were
produced by millions, and. at this moment there are te thousand makers of faces
by this ready and simple mode, for ten that set about the business with pallet
and brushes. The masses of the people, that is, the lower, middle, and the
working classes, are the chief patrons of this style of art ; and it is where
the masses most abound that its professors are most plentiful. Along those
thronged lines of route leading from the city towards the suburbs, in any
direction, the popular photographers select their stations. It is in these
places that the worker swarms in his hours of leisure, during the long summer
evenings and on the Sunday afternoons. Sunday, therefore, in London, we are
sorry to say, is the cheap photographer's grand day. On that day it is not at
all unusual with him to do as much work, and turn as much money, as during the
other six days of the week : then it is that he engages an additional touter out
of doors, and one or two additional assistants within. The touter penetrates the
crowd, and picks up the servant girls, who can rarely resist his blandishments
if they have a sixpence to spare. On a fine afternoon the traffic is furious;
the rival touters canvass every passer-by, and unfortunate "subjects " are
fought for, and dragged this way and that, like so much disputed property. Then
sometimes comes the policeman to settle the dispute, or, by walking off with the
disputants, to refer it to the arbitrement of the magistrates on the Monday.
It is for the accommodation of the masses, too, that cheap photographs are
taken by night. An American first introduced the night practice, by means of a
peculiar light which he warranted as his own invention, but which rivals in
trade were not slow to discover for themselves as soon as they witnessed its
success. The night subjects are generally of a rough class, not much given to
hypercriticism, or tender on the score of a blotch or two in background or
drapery — which lenity is but a fair return for the convenience of being done
cheap as dirt, up to eleven o'clock at night.
Who are all these thousands of cheap photographers? and what are their
antecedents? The answer to this question, we opine, would embrace a large and
various description of men, and women too. Some of them, as already hinted, are
ci-devant miniature-painters; a round number of them are tradesmen who have
failed in business; by no means a few are Jews ; numbers more are artisans,
clerks, and supernumeraries, who, wanting in regular employments, have taken to
the face-making trade in default of a better; others, again, are professional
men unable to establish themselves in their professions, and others are foreign
exiles. Among the women who practise the art, we know some who are widows with
families, whom they thus support ; and some who are journeymen's wives, who
pursue it to eke out the unsatisfactory wages of their husbands. The truth is,
that for the mere production of a positive picture on glass, the process is so
easy that a child may master it, and the capital to be invested is so small, as
to be within the reach of almost all ranks. Within a few minutes' walk of where
we are now writing, there is a cobbler who supplements the labours of his
lapstone by photographic experiments at sixpence a head; and a rag, bone, and
grease collector, who not only does ditto, but, being an experimental
philosopher, makes his own collodion.
Besides the multitude of practitioners in London, and all the large towns
and cities of the empire, there are a considerable army of them who travel the
country in all directions. There is not a market-town, village, or hamlet, even
in the remotest recesses of Wales, that has not been visited by the face-making
photographer, and paid tribute to his art. Those who first explored the country
districts reaped a capital harvest. The process was so wonderful, and the effect
was so extraordinary, that they could command their ownp rice; some of them
literally coined money, and where they expected but a few days' employment, got
stuck fast for months in the high tide of fortune — a state of things, however,
which did not last very long.
Another form of popular photography is that of the stereoscopic slides.
These are now so cheap, that the stereoscope and a dozen slides maybe bought for
a few shillings. The demand for these is so immense as to support large
establishments, and employ, it is said, nearly million of capital. They are
exhibited by hundreds of thousands in the shop windows, and embrace an endless
variety of every imaginable subject. Portraits are comparatively few among them
; but we have the Reverend Mr. Spurgeon and wife in their domestic retirement,
another reverend gentleman and wife in the same blissful circumstances, and a
few other celebrities. We have groups and conversation pictures—ghost scenes,
for which the stereoscope is remarkably adapted —public buildings, exteriors and
interiors, cities, towns, street scenes, coast scenes, dead game, fruit pieces,
and landscapes innumerable. All that is rare and picturesque in England, Wales,
and Scotland is brought home to the stereoscopist ; we have everything
noteworthy and historical in Syria, Palestine, Turkey, and Egypt; and, if report
is to be relied on, we shall have, before the present year is out, veritable
transcripts of scenery from India and China. The labour and the capital expended
in the production of slides is something startling. We could refer to a
travelling trio of friends who set out last year on a summer trip with the
camera, who came home in the autumn loaded with negatives, and sold them at once
for £2000. The stereoscopic publisher can afford a good price for copyright, for
he has the advantage over all other publishers — his plates cannot be pirated
successfully ; they never wear out, but will print on to the crack of doom, and
he need not print a single impression more than he has demand for. This
stereoscope slide piinting, by the way, is a business by itself, intrusted to
men who understand enough of photography, and it need not be much, to do it
successfully and for the present is tolerably lucrative. Then a prodigious
number of the slides are coloured, which being done by hand, adds from thirty to
sixty per cent. to their value. The colouring is done in good part by females;
young ladies do not object to the employment, and we know several thus
engaged, who find it an agreeable mode of earning money.
But if we are to look at the industrial side of the photographic art, we
should know neither where to begin nor where to stop. The consumption of picture
frames in London alone must be thousands daily; morocco cases, with gilded metal
mats within, are hardly less numerous, which last article, we may notice in
passing, has fallen by competition ninety per cent. in cost since the rise of
photography. Then there are the paper flats for larger photographs — a new
species of production, but in demand literally by the ton. Then what shall be
said of the lenses, which the opticians cannot make fast enough, and which cost
from two to a hundred guineas each; of the cameras, ever undergoing some new
improvement; of the standing machinery; and, lastly, not least but greatest item
of all, of the chemicals? Who shall say how much gold and silver is literally
spirited away in photographic operations? One item we will set down, because we
have it on undeniable authority. A single firm has consumed, within the last
twelve nonths, no less than a ton's weight, at the cost of £7000 for the raw
metal, of silver, for the manufacture of nitrate of silver for photographic
purposes. The whole stock was demanded and consumed as fast as it was
manufactured. What must be the number of the pictures produced, supposing each
to have required a single grain of the metal (and that would be a large
average), to necessitate the consumption of a ton's weight of silver? And seven
the answer to this question would only give the pictorial results from the
chemicals of a single manufacturing house.
Photography, they say, is as yet but in its infancy: truly, it is a
strapping babe, with a tolerable appetite for many things, the precious metals
among the rest. What it is doomed to be, when it comes to years of discretion,
remains to be seen.
The Leisure Hour, 1859