CHAPTER XIII.
The Work of Punishment and Reclamation.
The Effect of “The Society for the Suppression of Mendicity” State Business carried out by Individual Enterprise—”The Discharged Prisoners’Aid Society”—The quiet Work of these Societies Their Mode of Work— Curious Statistics Singular Oscillations—Diabolical Swindling.
The Society for the Suppression of Mendicity has done more towards checking
imposture, and bringing evildoers to punishment, than the Government itself,
notwithstanding all the elaborate and expensive machinery at its command. Nor,
by the way, is this a solitary instance of business peculiarly its own being
shirked by the State, and handed over to be dealt with by the skill, energy, and
perseverance of a few private individuals. A kindred association to that, the
province of which is the better government of the beggars of London, is that
which devotes its energies to the reclamation of returned convicts. Anyone at
all acquainted with the matter is aware of the immense amount of lasting and
substantial good that the “Discharged Prisoners’ Aid Society” has accomplished.
That the individuals chiefly concerned—the returned convicts
themselves—fully appreciate the advantages held out by the said Society is
sufficiently proved by the fact, that out of 368 licence-holders discharged into
the metropolis, 290 placed themselves in its hands. No doubt such arrangements
do prove as convenient as economical as regards the Government; but whether it
is just to inflict a responsibility of such magnitude on private individuals
is another question; or whether the easement it confers is cheaply purchased by
our rulers at the cost of so unmistakable a confession of their incapacity.
So quietly and unobtrusively do these self-constituted
guardians of public morality perform the arduous duties they undertake, that it
may be safely assumed not one person in a thousand is aware what their prime
objects are, let alone the means by which they are accomplished. As regards the
Mendicity Society, there can be no doubt what is the popular impression. It is
commonly regarded as a sort of amateur detective association for the discovery
of fraudulent begging,—a Society that has in its employ certain cunning
individuals of the detested breed of “spies,” who earn their wages by
lurking in shady places, and peeping over men’s shoulders, and covertly
listening to their private conversation. The full extent of the Society’s
usefulness, according to vulgar prejudice, is represented by the unfortunate
“cadger” pounced on in the act of receiving alms, and carried before a
magistrate to account for that enormous iniquity. People, however, who know no
more of the Society than this, know only of the smallest and least important of
its functions. It is a poor’s-relief association on an extensive scale. It has
its labour-sheds for testing the genuineness of the mendicants that apply at the
office, to say nothing of a real treadmill of its own. Moreover it proclaims its
ability to offer suitable employment to every
able-bodied mendicant referred to it. The following is the Society’s
method of dealing. The plan of the institution is to provide subscribers with
tickets, which are intended to be distributed to street-beggars only, and which
will insure admission to the Society’s office, where the applicant is examined
by the sitting or assistant manager, who directs such immediate relief as in his
judgment may appear proper.
If the applicant appears deserving, and is without lodging,
money sufficient to procure one for the night is given. In cases where the
applicant appears to have an immediate claim on any London parish, the pauper is
referred to the overseers of such parish. If, as in some cases, it is requisite
for the applicant to return on a subsequent day, he is furnished with a
return-ticket, which introduces him again to the office for further relief. In
the mean time inquiry is made, if practicable, into the character of the pauper,
by which the sitting manager is governed in awarding proper relief. Men are sent
to the Society’s premises to chop wood, and women and children to the
oakum-room. During the time they are employed, men receive eightpence, and women
four-pence per day, for lodging-money, and two meals, and one meal for each
member of the family; and on Saturdays double allowance of money, with an
extra meal to take home for each, that they may have no excuse for begging on
Sunday. Each meal in winter consists of a pint of nutritious soup, and a sixth
of a four-pound loaf of good bread; and in summer one quarter of a pound of
cheese, and the same proportion of bread. At the end of a week, if they apply,
the order for work may be renewed, until they have been employed a month, when
the case is discharged, unless the sitting manager considers an extension of
employment desirable; in which case it is laid before the committee, who renew
the order for another month, or give such other relief as they think most likely
to prevent the necessity of a recurrence to street-begging. In order to check
repeated applications from the same persons, those who habitually resort to the
refuges for the house-less, or the metropolitan workhouses, for lodging, and to
the Society for food, if males, have to perform three hours’ work at the mill;
if females, three hours’ work at oakum-picking, before food is given them; and
the men may also, if practicable, have three days’ work at stone-breaking.
Applicants of this description making more than six applications within one year
are refused further relief, unless on investigation they are found deserving of
assistance.
Persons who have not been six months in London are not considered
objects of the charity; but food is given to persons passing through London in
search of work, to assist them on their way. In the case of mendicants incapable
of labour, the amount of daily allowance is 6d. for a single man, 9d. for a man,
his wife, and young child, and is. in any other case; but this allowance may be
doubled on Saturday night, at the discretion of the sitting or
assistant-manager. Labourers at the mill receive 6d. per day, and the wife and
children of persons employed may receive a meal. The wives of men employed
either at the mill or stoneyard may also have work, and receive wages, provided
that their joint earnings do not exceed one shilling per day.
The Society’s “Report” recently issued shows the kind
and the extent of the business transacted through its officials up to the close
of the year 1867. It contains much that is interesting as well as instructive,
and not a little that is puzzling. We are informed that within the year 644
vagrants were arrested and taken before a magistrate, and that of this number
311 were committed, and 333 discharged. From the commencement to the close of
the year 1867, upwards of 10,000 cases of “casual” relief passed through the
hands of the Society, as well as between 400 and 500 cases that are alluded to
as “registered”—a term, it may be assumed, that distinguishes the ordinary
casual case from that which demands investigation and private inquiry. Amongst
the whole number, 44,347 meals were distributed, and a considerable sum of money
and some clothes; it being no uncommon occurrence for the management to rig-out
the ragged, hard-up unfortunate applying for relief, and to start him in the
world in a way that, if he has the intention, gives him a fair chance of
recovering a decent position.
The most curious part of the affair, however, appears in the
plain and simple tabulated statement that represents the yearly number of
vagrants relieved and set to work, and consigned to proper punishment, since the
time of the Mendicity Society’s first establishment. In the first year of the
Society’s existence, when the scheme was new, and the vagrant crop dead-ripe
for gathering, and the officers eager to get at their new and novel employment,
385 “sturdy beggars” were caught and sent to gaol. It is consoling to know
that in the last year (1967) this number was decreased considerably, and that no
more than 311 were sentenced. This may appear no vast reduction, but when we
consider not only the enormously-increased population since 1818, and, what is
of equal significance, the advance of intellect and cleverness and cunning
amongst this as every other community doomed to live by the exercise of its
wits, the result is one on which the country may be congratulated.
When, however, we come to regard the long column that at a
glance reveals the figures that pertain to vagrant committals for fifty
successive years, a decided damper is thrown on one’s hopes that the trade of
the shiftless roving vagabond is becoming surely though slowly extinguished. As
might be expected of a class so erratic in its movements, it would be difficult
to measure them by any fixed standard; but one is scarcely prepared to discover
the awful amount of uncertainty that prevails as regards the going and coming of
these impostor tramps, when there is a dearth of them, and when their swarming
may be expected. They are like cholera or plague, and have their seasons of
sloth, and again of general prevalence and virulence. The laws that govern the
movements of the professional beggar are inscrutable. You may make war on him
and thin his ranks, and prosecute him and persecute him, and by the end of the
year be able to show in plain unmistakable figures that he is not half the
formidable fellow he was last year; that you have blunted his sting and
decreased his dimensions. You still prosecute the war of extermination, and next
year you are in a position to reveal in black-and-white further glorious
results. The thousand has become seven hundred, and again the seven hundred
four. At this rate, ere two more years are elapsed, you may strip the rags from
your last beggar’s back, and hang them on the city gate as a scarecrow and a
caution against a revival of the detestable trade.
But alas for our delusive hopes! Come another year—that
which showed our seven hundred beggars dwindled down to four—and without any
apparent cause the enemy, crippled and more than half killed as it seemed,
reappears on the stage hale and sound, and with years of life in him yet. The
four hundred has grown to six. There are no means of accounting for it.
Depression of trade and poverty widely prevailing will not do so, for such are
times of prosperity and fattening with the professional beggar. When
“giving” is the order of the day, and benevolence, sickening at the sight of
privation and distress that seems endless, shuts her eyes and bestows her gifts
on all comers, then is the cadger’s harvest, then he may pursue his shameful
avocation with comparative impunity. If we required evidence of this, it is
furnished by the Society’s statistics. In 1865, which was an ordinarily fair
year with the working man, the number of vagrant committals reached 586, while
in the year following, when destitution prevailed so enormously, and the
outcries of famine were so generously responded to through the length and
breadth of the land, the number of begging impostors who got into trouble were
only 372.
It will be as well, perhaps, that the reader should have set
before him the figures for the various years precisely as they stand in the
Society’s last issued Report. As will be seen, for some reason that is not
explained, there are no returns for the four years 1830 to 1833 inclusive.
Appended to the “committed vagrant list” is a record of the number of cases
specially inquired into and “registered,” as well as a statement of the
number of meals that were in each year distributed.
Years... Cases registered ... Vagrants committed ... Meals given.
1818 ... 3,284 ... 385 ... 16,827
1819 ... 4,682 ... 580 ... 33,013
1820 ... 4,546 ... 359 ... 46,407
1821 ... 2,336 ... 324 ... 28,542
1822 ... 2,235 ... 287 ... 22,232
1823 ... 1,493 ... 193 ... 20,152
1824 ... 1,441 ... 195 ... 25,396
1825 ... 1,096 ... 381 ... 19,600
1826 ... 833 ... 300 ... 22,972
1827 ... 806 ... 403 ... 35,892
1828 ... 1,284 ... 786 ... 21,066
1829 ... 671 ... 602 ... 26,286
1830 ... 848 ... - ... 105,488
1831 ... 1,285 ... - ... 79,156
1832 ... 1,040 ... - ... 73,315
1833 ... 624 ... - ... 37,074
1834 ... 1,226 ... 652 ... 30,513
1835 ... 1,408 ... 1,510 ... 84,717
1836 ... 946 ... 1,004 ... 68,134
1837 ... 1,087 ... 1,090 ... 87,454
1838 ... 1,041 ... 873 ... 155,348
1839 ... 1,055 ... 962 ... 110,943
1840 ... 706 ... 752 ... 113,502
1841 ... 997 ... 1,119 ... 195,625
1842 ... 1,223 ... 1,306 ... 128,914
1843 ... 1,148 ... 1,018 ... 167,126
1844 ... 1,184 ... 937 ... 174,229
1845 ... 1,001 ... 868 ... 165,139
1846 ... 980 ... 778 ... 148,569
1847 ... 910 ... 625 ... 239,171
1848 ... 1,161 ... 979 ... 148,661
1849 ... 1,043 ... 905 ... 64,251
1850 ... 787 ... 570 ... 94,106
1851 ... 1,150 ... 900 ... 102,140
1852 ... 658 ... 607 ... 67,985
1853 ... 419 ... 354 ... 62,788
1854 ... 332 ... 326 ... 52,212
1855 ... 235 ... 239 ... 52,731
1856 ... 325 ... 293 ... 49,806
1857 ... 354 ... 358 ... 54,074
1858 ... 329 ... 298 ... 43,836
1859 ... 364 ... 305 ... 40,256
1860 ... 430 ... 350 ... 42,912
1861 ... 446 ... 335 ... 73,077
1862 ... 542 ... 411 ... 47,458
1863 ... 607 ... 451 ... 45,477
1864 ... 413 ... 370 ... 55,265
1865 ... 774 ... 586 ... 52,137
1866 ... 481 ... 372 ... 38,131
1867 ... 488 ... 311 ... 44,347
Total 54,767 ... 27,609 ...3,713,726
Assuming that the Society constantly employs the same number of officers, and that they
are always maintained in the same condition of activity, it is difficult to
account for the disparity displayed by the above-quoted figures. It would
almost seem that the mendicity constabulary were gifted with a prescience of
what was about to happen; that they know, by the barking of dogs or some other
unmistakable token, when “the beggars are coming to town,” and sallied out,
as fishermen do at the approach of herrings or mackerel, prepared, and fully
determined to make a good haul.
It is a pity that, despite the good work it accomplishes, the Society for the
Suppression of Mendicity should have weighty reasons for lamenting the
falling-off of public support it has of late experienced. Nothing could be more
promising than its launching. It took the field with a staff of eight constables
only, and an income of 4,384/.; nor could it be said to disappoint the expectations
of its patrons. In its first year of operation it prosecuted 385 professional
vagrants. Its success progressed. After a lapse of twenty-five years, in 1842 we
find it with an income of 6,576/.; and that prosperity had not dulled its energy
appears from the fact that in the year last mentioned there occurred, in the
deep waters where that slippery and voracious fish, the incorrigible beggar,
lurks for prey, the splendid catch of over thirteen hundred. Encouraged by so
fair a stroke of business, and the kindness and generosity of an appreciative
public, the Society then added a new branch to their business—the
begging-letter branch; which, it should be understood, did not originally come
within the scope of its operations in any shape.
At the expiration of another quarter of a century, however,
we find that, instead of an increase of income to the extent of one-third, as
occurred in the first quarter of a century of the Society’s existence, its
resources have fallen off to the extent of nearly one-half, as compared with the
income of 1842.
This is as it should not be. As has been shown, feeding the
deserving poor as well as punishing the inveterate vagrant comprises a
prominent feature of the Society’s business, and this it is impossible to do
without adequate funds. It might be supposed that the passing of the Houseless
Poor Act would have diminished the number of applicants to this and other
charitable societies; but there is a large class of persons temporarily thrown
out of work to whom the casual wards of workhouses are useless, and who do not
apply for assistance there. The number of this class who applied with tickets at
the Society’s office during the past year was more than
double the number of such applicants in the preceding year, being, in 1866,
4,378; but in 1867, 10,532. Among these poor persons 44,347 meals, consisting of
7,389 four-pound loaves, upwards of four tons of cheese and 785 gallons of
soup, have been distributed. In addition to this amount of food, 65/. 7s., in
small Sums of money, has been given to those whose cases seemed suitable for
such relief.
The apprehended cases were 644, as compared with 693 such
cases in 1866, but though a diminished constabulary force was employed for part
of the year, yet nearly as large a number of old offenders was committed by the
magistrate, being 311 compared with 372 in 1866. The number of begging-letters
referred to the office for inquiry during the past year was 2,019, being
somewhat fewer than the return of such applications for the year 1866. Of the
2,019 letters 790 were from unknown applicants; 620 from persons previously
known to the Society’s officials, but requiring a more recent investigation;
and 609 from persons too well known to require any investigation.
The following cases that have occurred during the past year
will show the mode in which the Society deals with the very different classes of
applicants brought within the sphere of its operations:
“No. 617. F. J.—This young man, 24 years of age, came to
the office with a subscriber’s ticket. He stated that he had been employed
last as a bookkeeper at Manchester, and left that situation in April, and had
since been in London seeking a situation, in which he had failed, and having no
friends here, had become destitute. He was a well-spoken single man, and
appeared to be truthful in his statements and anxious to return to Manchester,
where he had relatives who would assist him. At the instance of the presiding
manager some old clothes were given him, which improved his appearance, and
thirty shillings were handed to a constable to pay his fare, which was done, and
the balance was given to him. A few days after he wrote from Manchester a
letter, in which he stated that he had every prospect of obtaining employment,
and expressed much gratitude for what had been done for him at this office.”
“No. 883. S. F.—This woman, 37 years of age, applied to
the Society with a subscriber’s ticket, alleging her distress to have been
caused by the desertion of her husband and her own inability to procure
employment, owing to the want of decent clothing. She was sent to the
Society’s oakum-room to work, and while there saved enough money to purchase
several articles of wearing apparel. Inquiry was made; and it being found that
her statements were true and her character good, a situation was found her, in
which she still is, apparently giving satisfaction to her employers, and likely
to obtain a respectable living for the future.
“No. 169,150. 5. W. G.—This poor woman, the widow of a
labourer, and aged 45 years, had done her best to bring up her family in credit,
by keeping a small coal and greengrocery shop, making ginger-beer, &c.
during the summer months; and several of the children were nearly providing for
themselves, when she lost her sight, and was found in a state of distress. Her
eldest daughter had been obliged to leave her situation to look to the house;
but having a knowledge of the sewing-machine and a prospect of obtaining work at
home, it was decided to recommend the case for liberal relief, in order that a
machine might be obtained and the daughter thus enabled to assist in rearing the
younger children at home, which object there is reason to hope has been accomplished.”
“No. 54,494. C. T., alias
S.—A well-dressed woman was apprehended on a warrant, charging her with
obtaining charitable contributions by false pretences; she had been known to
the Society’s officers for years, and a number of complaints had been lodged
at the office against her during that time; when apprehended on previous
occasions no one could be found willing to appear against her. In the present
instance she had applied to a lady residing at Rutland-gate for a loan of 2/. to
enable her to take her brother to Scotland, whom she represented as having just
left the Brompton Hospital very ill, and that she had been advised to get him to
his native air, where they had friends. To strengthen her appeal she mentioned
the names of two or three persons known to the lady to whom she was applying,
and as having been sent by one of them to her; on the faith of the
representations made she was assisted with 2l6s.;
but subsequent inquiry convinced this lady that the statement was false. At
the time the prisoner was taken into custody she had 5/. 8s. 5½d.
on her person; and being made acquainted with the charge confessed herself
guilty of these offences, and offered to repay the money; but on the case being
stated to the magistrate he sentenced her to three months~ imprisonment, and
the money found in her possession to be applied to her maintenance while
there.”
“No. 42,064. T. B., with a number of aliases, was again
apprehended by one of the Society’s constables; he had been known as a
begging-letter impostor for upwards of twenty years, and during that period had
been three times transported, and as many times liberated on tickets-of-leave.
On this occasion (in company with a Woman whom he represented as a district
visitor) he applied to a gentleman residing in Eaton-square, stating he was
‘Mr. Bond,’ one of the overseers of St. Marylebone parish, and gave in his
card to that effect. On obtaining an interview, he said he and the lady with him
had interested themselves on behalf of a ‘Mrs. Cole,’ a widow with six
children, a native of Ledbury in Herefordshire, who wished to return home, where
she would be able to obtain a living for herself and family, and he was seeking
subscriptions to purchase the family a little clothing and funds to defray the
expense of their transit. The gentleman knowing Ledbury well, and believing
the prisoner’s statement to be true, gave him 10s.;
but afterwards finding that he had been imposed on, obtained a warrant for
his apprehension, and the case being clearly proved, he was sentenced to three
months’ imprisonment; and the magistrate remarked that a more hardened
criminal had never been brought before him, and that the Home Secretary should
be applied to to cause him to finish his unexpired term of two years and three
months.”
“No. 54,889. M. W.—A woman with an infant in her arms was
apprehended by one of the Society’s constables for endeavouring to obtain
money by false pretences from a gentleman residing in Portland-place, by stating
that her husband was at the Bournemouth Sanatorium, and produced a letter
purporting to be from the medical officer of the institution, which was as
follows:
‘National Sanatorium, Bournemouth, Hants . —The resident
surgeon wishes to inform Mrs. W. that her husband, having ruptured a
blood-vessel, is in a very precarious state. James W. is very desirous of seeing
his wife, and begs she will come as early as possible.’ This note was signed
as by the resident medical officer. She stated to the prosecutor that having no
means of paying her railway fare, she had applied to him for assistance, as he
had been kind to her husband on previous occasions. Being apprehended and
detained for inquiries, she admitted the truth of the charge made against her;
and the case being clearly proved, she was sentenced to three months’
imprisonment. The prisoner and her husband had been carrying on this system of
imposition for a long time, but owing to parties declining to come forward to
prosecute, had not previously been convicted.”
But there remains yet to notice one member of the
begging-letter-writing fraternity, compared with whom all the rest are mere
innocent and harmless scribblers. After an experience so long and varied, and so
many conflicts sharp and severe with their natural enemies the officers of the
“Society,” and so many exposures and defeats, it might be reasonably hoped
that the professional beggar whose genius takes an epistolary turn must find
his ingenuity well-nigh exhausted; but, as recent revelations have disclosed,
the machinery brought against him for this suppression has but sharpened his
wits and rendered him more formidable than ever. Although but recently
discovered, it is hard to say for how long a time this diabolical desire for
swindling the unwary has existed. Very possibly, many a “dodge” of minor
calibre has been invented and run the length of its tether, and died the death
of all dodges, while the one in question has lurked in the dark, and grown fat
and prospered.
It would be next to impossible for the imagination most
fertile in wicked invention to conceive anything more devilish and mischievous,
or an evil that might be perpetrated with less fear of detection. The mainspring
of the pretty scheme is not to impose on the benevolence and credulity of the
living, but to blast and vilify the character of the dead. To obliterate from
the hearts of those who were nearest and dearest to him—the husband dead and
buried—all kindly remembrance of him; to tear, as it were, from his poor
honest body the white shroud in which tender hands had enveloped it, and show
him to have lived and died a traitor, a hypocrite, and an impostor, false to
that very last breath with which he bade his wife, his “only darling,”
farewell; and this that some cold-blooded ruffian may extort from the wronged
man’s duped indignant survivors a few miserable pounds or shillings, as the
case may be.
The process by which the villany in question may be accomplished
is much more simple than would at first appear. The prime condition of the
impostor’s success is that he must reside at a long distance from those it is
his intention to dupe. The swindler lives in France or Germany, sometimes as far
away as America. The first “move” is to look into the newspaper obituary
notices for a likely victim. A gentleman who dies young, leaving a wife and a
numerous family to bemoan their bitter bereavement, is not uncommonly the case
fixed on. If, during his lifetime, he was a man who, from his station in life,
must have been tolerably well known, so much the better. It is a woman who
writes the letter. She writes of course to the individual as though not in the
least suspecting that he is dead. The following genuine copy of such a letter will, better than anything, illustrate
the cold, cruel, subtle villany essential to the success of the
“Dead-man’s lurk,” as in the profession it is styled:
“My ever-dearest Robert,—It is only after enduring the
sickening disappointment that has attended my last three letters sent to the
old address, that I venture to write to your private abode, in the fervent hope
that this my desperate appeal to your oft-tried generosity may fall into no
other hands but your own.
“I cannot think that my boy’s father can have grown cold
towards her whose whole life is devoted to him, who fled from home and friends,
and took up her abode in a foreign land and amongst strangers, that her darling
might not be troubled,—that his home might
be peace. Alas! what is my home? But I
will not upbraid you. Were I alone, I would be content to die rather than cause
you a single pang of uneasiness; but, as my dear Robert knows, I am not
alone. God still spares our boy to me, though I much fear that the
doctor’s prediction that he would get the better of his ailments when he had
turned the age of ten will not be verified. Sometimes as I sit of nights—long,
weary, thoughtful nights—watching my sick darling, and thinking of those old
times of brief bitter sweetness, I wish that you could see him, so like your own
dear self; but the thought is at once hushed, when I reflect on the pain it
would cause you to contemplate our poor fatherless
boy. I am almost tempted to thank God that he cannot remain much longer on
earth; but it is hard, cruelly hard, to see him suffer from want
as well as from his painful malady. Do, for the sake of the old times, send me a little money, though only a few pounds. There
is no other resource for us but the workhouse. At any rate, pray send me an
answer to this, and relieve the dreadful suspense that haunts me.
“P.S. As I have been, from reasons too painful to disclose
to you, compelled to quit the lodgings in V.-street, please direct
Post-office,—. Yours, ever true and faithful, Elizabeth .“
As it happened, the gentleman to whom this villanous epistle
was addressed had, till within a few years of his demise, resided in a far-away
quarter of the globe, and under such conditions as rendered a ten-years-ago
intimacy with any English Elizabeth utterly impossible; but unfortunately his
survivors were content to treat the attempted imposture with silent contempt,
and a likely opportunity of bringing to proper punishment one of a gang of the
most pestiferous order of swindlers it is possible to conceive was lost. It was
probably only the very peculiar and
exceptionally conclusive evidence that the letter could not apply to Mr.
Robert —, that saved his friends from painful anxiety, and perhaps robbery. It is so much less
troublesome to hush-up such a matter than to investigate it. To be sure, no one
would have for a moment suspected, from the precise and proper behaviour of
the man dead and gone, that he could ever have been guilty of such wickedness
and folly; but it is so hard to read the human heart. Such things have happened;
and now that one calls to mind— That is the most poisonous part of
it,—”now that one calls to mind!” What is easier than to call to mind, out
of the ten thousand remembrances of a man whose society we have shared for
twenty years or more, one or two acts that at the time were regarded as
“strange whims,” but now, regarded in the light that the damnable letter
sheds on them, appear as parts of the very business so unexpectedly brought to
light? Perhaps the man was privately charitable, and in benevolent objects
expended a portion of his income, without making mention of how, when, and
where, or keeping any sort of ledger account. How his means so mysteriously
dwindled in his hands was a puzzle even to his most intimate friends—now it is
apparent where the money went! But there, it is no use discussing that now; he
has gone to answer for all his sins, and it is to be devoutly wished that God,
in the infinite stretch of His mercy, will forgive him even this enormous sin.
Meanwhile it will never do to have this base creature coming as a tramping
beggar, perhaps with her boy, and knocking at the door, desperately determined
on being cared for by the man who was the cause of her ruin and her banishment.
Better to send her ten pounds, with a brief note to the effect that Mr. — is now dead, and it
will be useless her troubling again.
This is what did not happen
in the case quoted, and for the reasons given; but it might, and in very many
cases it doubtless has happened; and it would be worth a whole year’s catch of
common begging-letter impostors if the Society for the Suppression of Mendicity
could trap a member of the “Dead-lurk” gang, and hand him over to the tender
mercies of the law.