[- back to main menu for this book-]
[-THE GREAT METROPOLIS, VOLUME 2-]
[-216-] CHAPTER IV.
NEWGATE
Origin
of the name—Erection of the building—Description of the
interior—Classification of the prisoners—The chapel—” Condemned
Sermons.”—General Remarks—State of a prisoner’s mind the night before
his execution—Preparations for an execution—Miscellaneous observations.
NEWGATE
is situated close to the Old Bailey: it may be said, indeed, to form a part of
the same building. There is an open space of about thirty yards square between
them ; but the two places are joined together by a strong high wall. Newgate, as
everybody knows, is the great metropolitan prison for criminal offences. It is
the largest prison in the country, perhaps in the world. I shall afterwards have
occasion to [-217-] speak of its size in connexion with the number of prisoners that are
sometimes confined in it at once. It is a large massy building. Its exterior has
all the appearance of an indefinite durability. One would suppose that even Time
himself, whom Lord Bacon personifies as the great innovator, could hardly make
an impression on Newgate. It is supposed to have derived its name from the
circumstance of a gate leading through the city walls having been put up in the
thirteenth century,—which was called New Gate, to distinguish it from Lud
Gate. It is generally believed by metropolitan antiquarians to have been the
principal prison in London for upwards of five centuries past. The previous
Newgate was destroyed by the great fire of 1666. The present building was
commenced in 1776. Beckford, the well known patriot, and father of the
celebrated author of “ Vathek,” the builder of Fonthill Abbey, having been
Lord Mayor at the time, was chosen by his fellow citizens to lay the foundation
stone. What the expenses of the building were, I have not [-218-] been able to
ascertain; but they must have been very great; for independently of what was
contributed towards them by the corporation of London—to whose exertions in
the matter the citizens owed the erection of the edifice —government made a
grant of 50,0001. to assist in building the place. I shall, by-and-bye,
have to speak of the existing state of the interior of Newgate. Before the
erection of the present edifice, Newgate was so unhealthy a place as to prove
fearfully destructive of human life. It was scarcely ever without some fatal
disease, generated by the want of air, the putrid water the prisoners had to
drink, their crowding together, and the utter disregard of cleanliness
manifested by those who had charge of the apartments. There was then a
well-known disease peculiar to the place called the gaol distemper. Of this
disease, a popular writer of the middle of last century says, that the prisoners
daily died by dozens, and that cart-loads of men were carried out and thrown
into a pit in the churchyard of Christ Church. Thus the pestilence [-219-] not only
often anticipated the work of the executioner on those who would have been
doomed to expiate their crimes by their lives, but others, whose offences were
of so venial a nature as not to expose them to capital punishment, were, in many
cases, swept away within a few days of their crossing the precincts of the
prison. And once dead, not the slightest decency was observed as to the disposal
of their bodies. The same authority states that they were thrown into the earth
as if they had been so many brute beasts. Nor was the gaol distemper, of which I
have been speaking, confined to the inmates of the prison: it sometimes went
beyond the walls. The effluvia which was emitted in hot weather was so great and
offensive, that the inhabitants in the neighbourhood were constrained to
memorialise the government on the subject. They, in many cases, caught the
infection. On one occasion it penetrated into the sessions house, and produced
the most frightful results. Two of the judges, the lord mayor, several of the
jury, and various other persons, to the number [-220-] of sixty altogether, were seized
by the disease, and suddenly carried off by it. It was its fatal consequences to
others which first specially attracted the attention of the corporation of the
city to the horrible state of the interior of New-gate, and led to those
exertions on their part which ended in the erection of the present
edifice,—thus affording another illustration of the scriptural maxim, that
good is often brought out of evil.
The
present building was scarcely finished, though occupied by several hundred
prisoners at the time, when, in the riots of 1780, it was attacked by the mob,
who liberated the prisoners and destroyed everything combustible in the place.
The injury thus done to the building was repaired at the expense of parliament.
The building was completed in 1782. In length, it measures three hundred feet,
and the walls are fifty feet in height. At the time I write, the interior is
undergoing great alterations. It has often done so before. What, therefore, is
true of it as regards the arrangements, the classifica-[-221-]tion of the prisoners,
&c., at one time, is not so at another. Under the existing arrangements the
interior of the prison is divided into three stations.* (*I am here assuming,
that the same arrangements in this respect will be continued after the present
alterations have been completed.) The locality of the first of these is the
north wing, or that part of the building nearest Smithfield market, which has
three yards, with sleeping and day-rooms attached. The first yard and the rooms
belonging to it are occupied by grown-up convicts under sentence of
transportation; the second yard and rooms, are set apart for the boys, who have
also a school-room; the third yard and rooms, are used as the infirmary and
convalescent wards for the male prisoners. The second station is in the centre
of the building, and has also three yards, with day and sleeping-rooms attached.
The first of these yards and rooms are occupied by persons under sentence of
imprisonment for misdemeanors and felonies; and the other two yards and rooms
are tenanted by those male [-222-] prisoners who have not yet been tried. The press
yard, with the attached cells for the reception of criminals condemned to
death—of which cells I shall afterwards have to speak— are also locally
connected with this part of Newgate. The remaining or third station forms the
south wing, or that part of the building which is nearest to Ludgate Hill. There
all the female prisoners are confined. They have two yards allotted them, each
of which has sleeping wards and day-rooms attached. One of the two yards is
occupied by females who are awaiting their trials. Connected with this
department of Newgate, there is a school for girls. The upper story of this yard
is used as an infirmary for females. The second yard and attached apartments are
reserved for females under sentence of transportation for felonies and
misdemeanors.
The
number of night-rooms in Newgate is thirty-three. The number of inmates in them,
after dark, varies from fifteen to thirty. The number of day-rooms or wards is
only ten; so [-223-] that when the prison is full, there will sometimes be upwards of
forty persons in each. The principal wards and rooms in the several stations of
the prison are each about thirty-eight feet in length, and fifteen wide; the
smaller ones measure twenty-four by fifteen feet.
The most
painfully interesting part of Newgate to a stranger who visits it, is that in
which the places, technically called the condemned cells, are situated. These
cells are appropriated for the reception of those who are under sentence of
death. Of these cells there are three tiers, and in each tier there are five
cells, making the entire number of these gloomy abodes fifteen.
They are
situated on the north side of the prison, and adjoining the house of the
Ordinary, abutting Newgate-street. When a prisoner is convicted of a capital
offence he is removed to this part of Newgate, there to remain until the
Recorder has made his report to his Majesty. In case of a commutation of
sentence, the prisoners are transferred to the transport-yard, pre-[-224-]paratory to
their removal to the hulks. Those, on the other hand, against whom the fatal
sentence is to be carried into execution, are suffered to remain until that
moment arrives. In the day-time the prisoners are allowed to congregate together
in a large apartment called the day-room; but at night each is shut up in his
own cell The condemned cells are all situated on the first and second floors.
Connected, as already stated, with these cells, are two large rooms called
day-rooms; one on the ground floor opening into the press-yard, and the other
immediately above it, The lower is used by capital convicts; while the upper
room is reserved for devotional and sacramental purposes. The condemned cells
measure nine feet by seven feet; each of them has a small window guarded with
iron stanchions. The windows have severally a sliding shutter to admit light and
air, should the prisoner wish it. They are near the ceiling, but do not show
more light than is barely sufficient to enable the prisoner to read or write.
The great majority of the unhappy inmates are [-225-] without education, and of
uncultivated habits. They have no means of profitably employing their leisure
hours, and consequently chiefly spend their time in the use of the coarsest
possible language, and in condemning the laws which have condemned them. There
are, however, to this as to every other rule, some exceptions. The walls of each
cell being whitewashed every two years, and the prisoners being allowed the use
of pencils, some of them give expression to their feelings and sentiments in
their peculiar situation, by writing them on the walls. Any person who is
permitted to visit Newgate may learn, from the inscriptions on the walls, many
interesting facts illustrative of the various phases which human nature assumes.
While some of these inscriptions are of a character which show the utter
depravity of the parties writing them, there are others which indicate the
deepest penitence. Texts of scripture and passages from hymns, are among the
modes of expressing their feelings and sentiments most frequently used by the
latter class [-226-] of prisoners. In some few instances, however, where the parties
have a taste for poetry, they give utterance to their views in lines indited by
themselves. The following lines were written about twenty years since by a young
man then under sentence of death for forgery:—
“Thou
hapless wretch! whom justice calls
To dwell
within these dreary walls.
Know,
guilty man, this very cell
May be
to thee the porch to hell!
Thy sins
confessed—thy guilt forgiven— Mysterious change !—it leads to Heaven
These
lines were written under very peculiar and affecting circumstances. The unhappy
man was only twenty-two years of age at the time. He was a gentleman both by
education and manners. The offence for which he was convicted, and eventually
executed, was that of having committed a forgery on the Gravesend bank, to the
extent of 741. He had been induced to do this solely from an anxiety to learn
the Hebrew language, for which he had a great aptitude. As soon as he got the
money he re-[-227-]paired to a monastery in the South of France, and entered himself as
a student there, under one of the professors celebrated for his knowledge of the
Hebrew language. His retreat being discovered, he was brought back to England,
tried, and convicted. He had spent but little of the money when he was
apprehended; but notwithstanding this fact, in conjunction with his most amiable
disposition and exemplary morals, such was the sanguinary character of our
criminal jurisprudence at that period, that he was doomed to suffer the extreme
penalty of the law. I may mention as an extraordinary proof of the singularly
excellent character of this young man, whose name I forbear to mention, lest
some of his relatives may still survive, that hearing his friends were making
great exertions to procure a commutation of his sentence, he strenuously
resisted it on the ground that as another young man had been executed a few days
previously for precisely the same offence, there would be an injustice in
allowing him to escape. His fate excited the deepest regret in [-228-] the minds of all
who were acquainted with the circumstances; and the inhabitants of Gravesend,
where he had lived for many years, erected a handsome monument to his memory.
Formerly
the practice in Newgate, on the night previous to the execution of prisoners,
was to shut them up in cells on the ground floor. From these they proceeded
along a dark narrow passage to the place of execution. Anything more gloomy than
those cells it were impossible to imagine. They have all the appearance of
subterraneous holes. They are now used as places of lumber. The Rev. Dr. Dodd
was shut up in one of these cells the night before his execution. I could not
look into his cell without the most painful feelings.
One very
interesting part of Newgate is the chapel in which divine service is performed
in the presence of the prisoners. When what is termed a “condemned sermon”
is to be preached in it—that is to say, a sermon previous to an
execution—the chapel becomes a place of peculiar interest both to the
prisoners, and to many [-229-] persons from without.* (*Formerly admission was to be
obtained to the chapel to hear a condemned sermon preached, on paying
half-a-crown; but no admission money is now received.)
On such occasions there is always a crowd of persons at the felons’
door, waiting to obtain admission when the service is about to commence. Though
the chapel is only capable of accommodating 400 persons with comfort, 700 or 800
will sometimes be wedged into it when a condemned sermon is to be preached.
People are attracted by two things on such occasions. The one is a desire to
hear a sermon under such circumstances, and the other is a curiosity to see the
poor unhappy creature about to be hurried into the presence of his Creator.
There is a gallery in the chapel which is appropriated to strangers on such
occasions. Another gallery is set apart for the female prisoners, who are shut
out from the view of the male prisoners by a curtain. In the body of the chapel
are the male prisoners. The “condemned pew,” or the pew which is
appropriated to the unfortunate man whose days are [-230-] numbered, is in the centre.
It is black all over, which only serves to heighten, by contrast, the unearthly
paleness of the miserable occupant. The pulpit and reading-desk are hung with
black, and the whole appearance of the place, conjoined with the associations
which arise in one’s mind, produces the deepest solemnity of feeling. No man
could remain any time in it without feeling his mind overwhelmed with an
undefinable melancholy, even on those occasions when no “condemned sermon”
is to be preached. What then must be one’s emotions when he sees before him a
fellow-creature within a few hours of being ushered into the presence of the
Divine Being, and hears a sermon which has an almost exclusive reference to the
culprit’s situation?
I am not
sure whether, after all, these “ condemned sermons” are judicious. The
miserable parties to whose circumstances they are intended to apply, are not in
a condition, in one case out of a hundred perhaps, to profit by them. Any one
who reflects for a moment on [-231-] the situation of such persons, must at once come to
this conclusion. But the matter is not one of mere inference. Every person who
has been present while these sermons were being delivered, must have seen in the
appearance of the parties, that they were insensible to what was going on. With
very few exceptions, indeed, they cannot walk into the pew set apart for them
without support, and when they are in it, it is with difficulty they can retain
a sitting position. Their tottering frames, their wild and vacant look, and
indeed their aspect altogether, force the conviction on every spectator’s
mind, that they are incapable of attending to the sermon. The sound of the
preacher’s voice rings in the ear of the wretched beings for whom the
discourse is specially intended, but his words have no meaning in them. But even
supposing there was nothing, in the fact of their trembling on the very verge of
eternity, to unfit them for paying, the requisite attention to the solemn
admonitions of the preacher, the circumstance of their being constantly stared
at [-232-] by the strangers, and the other prisoners, would of itself be sufficient to
discompose them. Would it not be much better to allow them to remain in their
cells while service is being performed in the presence of the other prisoners,
and then, on its close, to let the Ordinary speak to them in private? Their
minds, in such circumstances, would be much more susceptible of devout
impressions.
I have
often thought, when reflecting on the subject of “ condemned sermons,” that
at the very time such sermons are being preached before one or more unhappy
creatures doomed to death, there are, it may be, hundreds of others throughout
the Christian world who are also heating their
last sermon, though unconscious of it. The thought is one which is well
fitted to awaken in the mind a train of serious reflections; but it would be out
of place in a work of this nature to indulge in it.
In the
chapel in Newgate, divine service is performed in precisely the same way as in
any of the established churches in the metropolis. [-233-] There is a clerk, a communion
altar, an organ, &c,, for the due performance of the ritual of the church.
The Rev. Ordinary being himself a rigid churchman, is strictly observant of all
the formularies which the church enjoins on those in her communion. In reading
the liturgy, his fine sonorous voice—now, owing to advanced years, it is not
so effective—was formerly the admiration of all who heard it. Its varied and
powerful intonations, conjoined with the solemnity of the speaker’s aspect,
and the affecting associations connected with the place, were strikingly
calculated to produce a deep impression on the minds of all present. Even now,
there are few clergymen in the church who can read the service with greater
effect.
The
condition of Newgate as regards its moral relations, is still far from being
what it ought to be; but a very marked improvement has taken place in this
respect within the last twenty years. Before that time it was a perfect hotbed
of all descriptions of crime. It were impossible to form an idea of the amount
of in[-234-] jury which it has, from first to last, done to its inmates. Boys and girls
of tender ages were formerly committed to Newgate for offences of the most
trifling nature. They were, with very few exceptions, committed for the first
offence, the police magistrates making no distinction between the mere tyro in
crime, and the most confirmed criminal. The youthful creature who, it may have
been, stole a penny-worth of bread to administer to the cravings of hunger, and
who knew not even in thought what crime, in strict propriety of speech meant,
was doomed to mingle in Newgate with the most depraved and hardened offenders in
the metropolis. Evil communications have, under any circumstances, a tendency to
corrupt good manners. In Newgate the destruction of all moral feeling on the
part of those who entered it with any, was an almost inevitable result. What
else could be expected where a simple unsuspecting youth was doomed to associate
with some of the worst characters in London? Escape from the contagion of such
evil example [-235-] as was there hourly set them, from the moment they crossed the
threshold of the place, could be little short of miraculous. The worst language
was constantly heard, and the person who refused to take part in the shocking
conversations of the vilest of the inmates, was persecuted beyond endurance. The
leaders in crime were constantly talking of their great exploits that way; and
as they were a sort of heroes in the eyes of the majority, those who entered
Newgate comparatively innocent, came out fired by an ambition, as they
considered it, of imitating the achievements of the worst of the inmates. There,
too, the mere novice was, in a few days, instructed in the ways of crime much
more perfectly, than he would have been by years of study and practice out of
doors. The cases were consequently innumerable in which youths who went into
Newgate without anything like a propensity to the commission of crime,—with,
indeed, an entire horror of it, altogether irrespective of its penal
consequences,—Came out with their minds so depraved as to fit them [-236-] for
undertaking the most daring enterprises, and
committing the most fearful atrocities. Thus Newgate actually promoted
objects the very reverse of those it professed to have in view. Instead of
repressing crime, it proved a most fertile nursery of it in its worst forms.
Mrs. Fry, of whose labours in Newgate I shall have to speak presently, in her
evidence before a committee of the House of Commons in 1818, has one short
passage which of itself speaks volumes as to the state of morals in Newgate
previous to the time I have mentioned. “Women,” she says, “who came in
weeping over their deviations—some small deviations perhaps—by the time of
their trial or dismissal would sometimes become so barefaced and wicked as to
laugh at the very same things, and to be fitted for almost any crime. I
understand that before we went into the prison it was considered a reproach to
be a modest woman.”
The same
excellent lady says in another part of her evidence, which was limited to the
female side of the prison, that there she witnessed the [-237-] most dreadful
proceedings. There were begging, swearing, gaming, fighting, singing, and
dancing, and scenes too revolting to be described. Matters, it is unnecessary to
say, were still worse on the male side of the prison. It was when such was the
moral condition of Newgate, that Mrs. Fry, who is an honour alike to her species
and her country, first began her philanthropic labours in it. The reformation
which she has effected is incalculably great. The amount of good she has, from
first to last, accomplished by her benevolent exertions within the walls of
Newgate, will never be known in this world. Her’s was a quiet, unobtrusive
philanthropy. In her labours of mercy she shrunk from the public gaze. How many
hours of her life she has spent amidst the physically and morally repulsive
scenes of the interior of Newgate, is not known to the public. But I may
mention, having had it from the lips of one of her most intimate friends, that
for many years a large portion of her time was spent within the walls of that
prison. Her’s, indeed, was philanthropy [-238-] worthy of the name. It was a
philanthropy based, as all true philanthropy must be, on the religion of Him who
ever went about doing good. And her labours of love were as judicious as they
were laudable. She first established a school for the instruction of the
children of the convicts, and then she undertook the care of the female convicts
themselves. What an amount of moral courage, self-denial, and patient endurance,
must have been necessary for the accomplishment of such objects as this
excellent woman contemplated!
But
though, by the indefatigable and zealous labours of Mrs. Fry, assisted by other
benevolent ladies whom she organised into a committee, an incalculable amount of
good has been done in Newgate, there is still room for great improvement. It
will never be made what it is intended to be—a place for the correction of
offenders and the repression of crime, so long as the system of allowing the
prisoners to associate together is continued. They will necessarily corrupt one
another, and employ their time in [-239-] forming new schemes for the commission of
crime, as soon as they have regained their liberty. That they deem imprisonment
in Newgate no great punishment, if, indeed, it be any punishment at all, is
proved by the fact of so many of them being returned within a few months of
their liberation. There are many instances on record of criminals spending full
one-half of their time in Newgate, until, as they themselves say, a new leaf is
turned over by their being transported beyond seas. Not many years ago, a youth
under twenty, was found in Newgate for the thirteenth time. The separation of
the prisoners from one another; in other words, solitary confinement, is the
only thing which will ever invest Newgate, or any other gaol, with sufficient
terror to a criminal’s mind, to deter him from the commission of crime. The
solitary system has been tried in other places, and found most effectual. I am
glad to understand that it is in contemplation to resort to it in London. I am
satisfied it will be followed here, as in [-240-] other places, by a very great and
permanent diminution of crime.
In
Newgate, there is a stated clergyman called the Ordinary* (*The Rev. Mr. Cotton
is now, and has been for many years, the Ordinary of Newgate.), for
administering to the spiritual wants of the prisoners. Divine service is
performed every sabbath-day in the chapel belonging to the place: the prisoners
are all obliged to be present. The Ordinary whose heart is in the work of
endeavouring to convert sinners, will always find scope enough in the interior
of Newgate for his most indefatigable exertions. The inmates are of necessity
precisely that class of persons who, of all others, stand most in need of
spiritual instruction and spiritual admonition. But the most solemn and
affecting part of the Ordinary’s duty is, to administer to the exigencies of
those on whom the sentence of death is about to be executed. This is not only a
duty of an awfully solemn nature, but it is one which, for its due
perform-[-241-]ance,
pre-eminently requires a sound judgment as well as warm Christian affection. It
is one, in the performance. of which the Ordinary is usually assisted by one or
more ministers of various denominations, or by some private individuals whose
breasts burn with Christian compassion for the souls of the unhappy persons who
are about to be ushered into the presence of their Maker. There lives not the
man who can more cordially venerate than I do, those philanthropic individuals
who spend so much of their time in endeavouring to enlighten the minds of those
in Newgate who are standing on the verge of eternity, in matters of a spiritual
kind. But I am afraid that their good offices are sometimes deficient in
Christian prudence. I confess it has always appeared to me a matter which ought
to be one of deep concern to Christians, that almost all the culprits who are
executed, mount the scaffold with the most entire persuasion, that all is safe
as regards their future destinies. In most cases they have had only a few
conversations with their spiritual advisers, before [-242-] they seem to be as much
satisfied that their absence from the earth will be their presence in heaven, as
that they are about to close their connexion with all things below for ever.
This is a matter of such general occurrence, that it has become a daily remark,
that if a man wishes to make sure of the way to heaven he has only to go by the
gallows. I am aware that the abuse of a thing is no argument against the thing
itself; and that though some men were on this account to think lightly of the
commission of crimes against society, that would be no reason for not
communicating spiritual instruction, and administering, within proper limits,
spiritual consolation, to persons condemned to death. But I much fear that when
the cases are so numerous in which men who have been guilty of the grossest
crimes, both against the Deity and their fellow-men, thus ascend the scaffold
with so entire a confidence in a happy hereafter, there must be something
injudicious in the way in which the duties of a spiritual monitor are
discharged. I am not [-243-] without my apprehensions that men make their exit out of
the world, at the Old Bailey, with the most entire persuasion that all is well,
whose minds have not been sufficiently enlightened on the great matters which
pertain to their souls and eternity, and whose hearts have not undergone that
change which the scriptures declare to be essential to salvation. To me it would
be much more satisfactory if, in the majority of cases, I saw the unfortunate
individuals who are doomed to die on the scaffold, look forward to their
appearance before the great white throne, with fear and trembling. For sinners
of the greatest magnitude, as such individuals usually are, this, in my view of
the matter, would be, in most cases, a more becoming frame of mind, than the
entire confidence and perfect composure which are so common. Death-bed
repentances are proverbially doubtful; and I much fear that there are many of
those who mount the scaffold without the dread of a hereafter, who would, were
their sentences to be reversed and themselves [-244-] again turned loose on society, be
found to be essentially the same persons they were before. I am much afraid, in
other words, that their confidence is in many cases a false confidence,
generated by the grievously mistaken, but best-intentioned representations of
those who have conversed with them on spiritual matters. I fear that the mercy
of the Almighty is sometimes dwelt upon to the almost entire exclusion of
sin’s sinfulness, the magnitude of the party’s guilt, and of the necessity
of heartfelt contrition and brokenness of spirit to everlasting happiness. That
is not true Christian charity which would, in such a case, gloss over the
culprit’s sins against his Maker, or only dwell on them in general terms.
Enlightened Christian benevolence would, while pressing on the criminal’s
attention the glorious truth that there is salvation for the very chief of
sinners, seek to impress his mind with a deep sense of the enormity of his own
guilt. I know of no spectacle in the world of a more awfully affecting
character, than that of a person about [-245-] to be ushered into the presence of his
Maker, with the most entire persuasion that all is well, while he has never had
a single overwhelming conviction of sin. That of the man who leaves the world
without any thought at all about his future destiny, is, undoubtedly, affecting
enough; but it is not to be compared with the case which I have just supposed. I
fear that those who are on the eve of being executed at the Old Bailey, have, in
many cases, the language of “ Peace, peace” whispered in their ears, before
their minds have been sufficiently impressed with a sense of their spiritual
danger. This is a mistaken leniency. Surely if there be a case in which
faithfulness is required, it is in that of a criminal of no ordinary magnitude,
about to be ushered into the eternal world. Let those whose Christian
philanthropy prompts them to converse with persons sentenced to death, point out
to them the all-sufficiency of the finished work of Emmanuel for sinners of the
deepest dye; hilt let them guard against anything which would have tendency to
inspire a false confidence in the mercy of the Almighty. [-246-] If I
understand the theology of revelation aright, it may be laid down as a general
principle, that where there are not convictions of sin, and brokenness of spirit
on account of it, there can be no salvation. I know that there may be different
degrees as regards the force of these convictions and the depth of the
contrition; but those, to say the least of it, are doubtful cases, especially at
the Old Bailey, where these feelings are not sufficiently marked to strike the
mind of one who converses with the doomed culprit on spiritual matters. I am
sure it can hardly be necessary to say, that in these observations I have no
particular persons nor particular cases in my eye. They have been dictated
solely by the painful apprehension which has arisen in my own mind, from what I
read and hear of persons expiring on the scaffold, whether at the Old Bailey or
elsewhere, that the calmness with which such persons die is in many cases the
consequence of a false confidence arising from ignorance of the magnitude of
their own guilt, and the awful enormity of sin.
[-247-] Perhaps
there are few more affecting things in the world than to spend with a man
sentenced to death, the last night of his sentence. I have heard from the lips
of one who has spent many such nights with unhappy men in Newgate, statements as
to their feelings and conduct of the most deeply touching kind. Occasionally
culprits are to be found who remain hardened to the last. They have lived in the
disbelief of a future state of rewards and punishments; and they cling to their
wretched infidelity to the last. There are others, who as they have lived in
utter recklessness of everything religious, never having bestowed a thought as
to whether Christianity be true or not, so in that state of awful recklessness
they die. But instances of either kind are exceedingly rare. The atheist or
deist has his mental perceptions on religious subjects greatly improved, when
the immediate prospect of another world is before him. The evidences in favour
of Christiaitity which he formerly laughed to scorn, as no evidences at all, now
commend themselves to his mind with all the force of an [-248-] irresistible conviction;
and he dares no more doubt the truth of that religion, than he dare doubt the
fact that his days are numbered, and that he is standing on the very brink of
eternity. The man who had been as thoughtless before about a future state and
his own probable destiny, as the brutes that perish, is now the subject of an
overwhelming anxiety. Let any one stretch his imagination to the utmost, and try
to picture to himself what must be the state of mind of such persons the night
previous to their execution. However vivid may be one’s imagination, it will
fall infinitely short of the fearful reality. Perhaps the history of mankind
affords no example of the human mind being in a condition so solemn and
appalling. The wretched party knows that he has but a few hours to live.
Conscience summons up from the depths of the past, all the transgressions of the
greatest magnitude he has committed, whether against his Maker or his
fellow-men. To the latter he can now make no atonement; and even though he may
cherish the hope that his guilt is expiated [-249-] in the sight of Him into whose
presence he is about to be ushered, yet this hope will not prevent his feeling,
in all their acuteness, the agonies of remorse. The mind is, as it were, torn by
the conflicting claims of the two worlds; by the claims of that he is about to
leave, and those of the world into which he is on the eve of being hurried. He
has relatives and friends: it may be he has parents alive, or that he has a wife
and children. How must the thought of parting for ever from them, coupled with
that of the circum stances under which he is about to close his life, agitate
his bosom! Never to see them more in time, were of itself under any
circumstances an awfully affecting consideration; but to reflect that he
bequeaths to them the disgrace of dying by the hands of the public executioner,
and that they can never recur to his memory without the most painful feelings,
are thoughts that give a terrible additional poignancy to his mental distress.
Then there is the thought of suffering an ignominious death next day in the
presence of thousands. That is a thought which [-250-] constantly haunts his mind and
harasses it beyond all conception. Contemporaneous with such reflections are his
thoughts about the world he is about to enter. Where the unhappy man has no
hope, what must be his state of mind in the immediate prospect of eternity! I
will not dwell on such a topic it is indescribably terrible. Even where he has
hope, there will be an overwhelming awe on his mind, at the thought of being in
a few hours before the tribunal of his Judge. With a mind so exercised, is it to
be wondered at that the last night of one’s existence in Newgate should be
spent in a state of frenzy? His brain reels; his lips are compressed; his tongue
is parched with a burning thirst; in his eye there is a vacant, unearthly
expression; his complexion has, a spectral appearance; he is incapable of
remaining for any time in one position, or in one place; his hair stands on end;
a cold perspiration bathes his face; the clamminess of death is already on his
skin; his whole appearance and demeanour show that his bosom is the seat of the
most tumultuous emotions. [-251-] The
gloomy aspect of his cell is in striking accordance with the sadness of his
soul. The little glimmering light allowed him, only serves to let him see the
horrors of his situation. He feels himself already as effectually shut out from
the world as if he were no longer in it. The silence which reigns around him is
awful He might almost hear the falling of a pin. His own hurried breathing
alarms him. He starts at the sound of every movement he makes. His very shadow
frightens him. The bell of St. Paul’s strikes the hour; his breast palpitates
at the sound, as if it were a summons to him to appear that instant in the
presence of his Maker. The deep and solemn tones of the bell, made more solemn
by the awfulness of his situation, remind him with a terrible reality that he
has but a few hours to live. When he can so far compose himself, he turns to his
bible; that book which perhaps he has not opened for a long series of years. The
recollection of his youthful days when, at school or at home, he had used at
stated intervals to read certain portions of the inspired vo-[-252-]lume, rushes on his
mind, and he bitterly reproaches himself for having disregarded its heavenly
precepts. He muses on these touching topics for a little, and then kneels down
on his cold floor to implore the Divine mercy. The picture is altogether
frightful to contemplate: it is no imaginary one: it rather falls immeasurably
short of the reality.
It is
true that as there are exceptions to every rule, so there are to this. As before
stated, some men remain hardened to the last; doing violence equally to the laws
of friendship and the claims of religion. The very brutes themselves, could they
be made sensible of their approaching death, would betray more feeling than do
some of those unhappy men who are doomed by the laws of their country to suffer
by the hands of the public executioner. It may be in the recollection of some
that when Thistlewood and the other Cato Street conspirators were executed in
1819, for high treason, some of them into only conducted themselves with a brute
insensibility to their situation, the night before their deaths, but that [-253-] when
on the scaffold, and within a few moments of being in the presence of their
Maker, they made wry faces at the spectators with a view of making them laugh,
and played the buffoon until the cord encircled their necks.
And I
have heard of others who, with nothing of the spirit of bravado in them, as in
this case, have felt and acted up to the last moment of their existence, as if
on the morning of their execution they were only going to attend their usual
avocations. This was not, with the persons to whom I refer, the effect of any
miscalled philosophical notion: it arose from an easiness of mind which not even
the immediate prospect of death itself could affect. One who was an eye-witness
of the fact has informed me, that on a young man being brought out for
execution, a good many years ago, at Newgate, he discovered on his way to the
scaffold, that one of the laces of his half-boots was loose, and having got the
permission of the officers, he bestowed nearly a minute in adjusting it. In the
course of doing so, he found that he had missed one of the [-254-] holes of the boot
through which he should have put the cord, on which he immediately undid the
whole and put the string quite right. The young man had always been remarkable
for his attention to “tidiness,” as he called it. The least disarrangement
of any part of his dress, though that dress, from his circumstances in life, was
always homely enough, made him quite unhappy; it seemed to be the only thing
which ever disturbed the equanimity of his mind. What a singular illustration
this circumstance affords, of the ruling passion being strong in death!
The
execution of a human being at any place, and under any circumstances, is an
occurrence of an awfully interesting kind. One at the Old Bailey possesses, from
a variety of adventitious circumstances which I need not mention, a peculiarly
fearful interest. The first preliminary step towards it is that of reading, in
the hearing of the convicts, the sermon which the Rev. Dr. Dodd preached to his
fellow-prisoners immediately before he himself was offered up a sa-[-255-]crifice to the
Moloch of a sanguinary criminal jurisprudence. This and other devotional
services suited to the awful occasion, being over, the condemned party is shut
up in the cell for the night. If he can so far compose his mind, under the
melancholy circumstances in which he is placed, as to close his eyes in sleep,
he is sure to be awakened at between four and five o’clock in the morning, by
the sound of the horses’ feet and the wheels of the vehicle, which drag forth
from the court-yard. the apparatus for his execution. And what an awakening must
that be! Poets talk of the sound of the death-knell; what are their images to
this? To awake, it may be from a pleasant dream of a long and happy life and
there are abundant instances of the kind—and to find, that his first conscious
impression is, that the sounds which have disturbed his slumbers, are sounds
which denote the immediate proximity of an ignominious death,—is surely one of
the most terrible situations in which a human being can be placed! The very
transition, in the supposed case, from [-256-] visions of a joyful nature to a sense of
the party’s impending doom, can only serve to heighten the awfulness of that
doom. The “heavy noise” caused by the clattering of the horses’ hoofs, and
the rattling of the wheels of the ponderous vehicle, employed to carry out to
the front of the building the materials out of which the gallows is to be
erected,—is regarded by the turnkeys and other officers of the place, as the
signal for their rising from their beds and performing the functions which
severally belong to them, in the affecting spectacle about to be exhibited.
Before six, all is bustle and activity in and about the prison. About that hour,
Mr. Baker, a pious dissenter, repairs to the cell of the prisoner about to
suffer, and admonishes him of a fact with which he is already but too well
acquainted, namely, that he has but an hour or two to live. Mr. Baker then
endeavours to take advantage of the awful circumstances in which the unhappy man
is placed, to impress his mind with the great truths of religion, and to urge
him to improve the few mo-[-257-]ments that remain to him of life, in making up his
peace, through faith in the atoning blood of a Saviour, with the Being before
whose tribunal he is about to appear. Mr. Baker not only admonishes, but prays
with and for the unhappy man. Prayer is, or at least it ought to be, at any
time, a solemn exercise; but what must be the solemnity which pervades a true
Christian’s mind, when he is interceding at a throne of grace for an immortal
spirit which he knows will have a sentence of everlasting happiness or endless
misery passed upon it before two hours have elapsed! The Rev. Dr. Cotton, the
Ordinary of the prison, arrives before seven, to administer the sacrament of the
supper to the unhappy man, should he be disposed to receive it. Then come the
Sheriffs and Under-sheriffs, accompanied by some of their friends who maybe
desirous of witnessing an execution. A few minutes before the time appointed for
bringing the unhappy party on the scaffold, all those who have been admitted
into the interior of Newgate are conducted to a part of the prison called the
[-258-] press-room, where Mr. Cope desires them to remain and make as little noise as
possible until the prisoner comes in, which is usually four or five minutes
afterwards. That is a time of deep and awful interest, even to those who are
only to be witnesses of the dreadful drama about to be enacted. Often have the
hearts of persons of the greatest nerve been known to quail, and their limbs to
quiver, while spending these few minutes in such circumstances. There is
something in the deep gloom of the room, together with the massy ponderous
appearance of the walls of the prison, which are seen out of the window, which
accords with the sadness of soul caused by the contemplation of the scene which
is on the eve of being exhibited. The prisoner is brought into the press-room,
and on being led up to a table in the centre, undergoes the process of
pinioning. This is not done, as is generally supposed, by the executioner. It is
the duty always of the Sheriffs’ officers, who are in this case the assistants
to the executioner, to pinion the hands of the culprit. Perhaps it were [-259-] impossible to conceive a more solemn or affecting spectacle than that of the
procession into the press-room, previous to the prisoner’s undergoing the
preparations for his execution. The Sheriffs and Under-sheriffs carrying their
staves first enter the apartment. The Rev. Ordinary, whose appearance is
remarkably venerable, follows; and last of all comes the unhappy being himself.
The preliminary arrangements in the press-room for the execution seldom occupy
more than two or three minutes. The whole of those present then form themselves
into regular order, and move in due procession through the dark passages of the
prison towards the gallows.
There is
something solemn and impressive in the appearance of a funeral procession: how
much deeper must be the impressiveness, and greater the solemnity, of such a
procession as this! There is one who acts a part in it who in a few minutes will
cease to exist. His connexion with the world is on the eve of closing for ever,
and that, too, tinder circumstances of the most awful kind. The Rev. Ordinary
reminds [-260-] the unhappy man of the fact, by reading aloud the burial service of the
church. Contemporaneously with the first step the procession takes, the Rev.
Gentleman pronounces in distinct and sonorous tones—” I am the resurrection
and the life. He that believeth in me, though be were dead, yet shall he live;
and whosoever liveth and believeth in me, shall never die,” &c. Perhaps
there are not more expressive passages in the Scriptures, than those which the
church has selected as part of her burial service. They have a solemnising
effect when delivered with feeling and propriety over the grave of a departed
fellow being. * (* Let me not be understood from this as approving of the
funeral service of the church. I regard it as a thing which is altogether
unwarranted in Scripture to represent Jesus as the resurrection and the life of
all who die, indiscriminately.) How much more solemn must that service be when
said over a living being just on the threshold of eternity! The Rev. Ordinary
continues pronouncing the service of the church until the Sheriffs, the
Under-sheriffs, himself, and [-261-] the prisoner, reach the scaffold, when the voice of
the Rev. Gentleman is drowned amidst the noise caused by the assembled thousands
of spectators. The prisoner then ascends the steps which lead to the eminence
called the drop, whence he is to be plunged into the ocean of eternity. The
executioner, who before this time has nothing to do with the wretched
individual, now takes charge of him, and proceeds to complete the remaining
arrangements necessary to his final exit. The executioner places him in the
exact spot where the fatal work may be completed. The rope is adjusted, the cap
is drawn over his head down to his chin, and the signal is put into his hand,
Mr. Cotton then resumes the reading of the burial service
“Man
that is born of a woman bath but a short time to live, and is full of misery. He
cometh up, and is cut down like a flower; he fleeth, as it were a shadow, and
never continueth in one stay. In the midst of life we are in death: of whom may
we seek for succour but of thee, O Lord! who for our sins art justly displeased.
[-262-] Yet, O Lord God most holy! O Lord most mighty! O holy and most merciful Saviour!
deliver us not into the pains of eternal death !“ The signal is then given,
and in a few moments the prisoner is in eternity.
If one
could suppose a man—and there have been instances of the kind, though
extremely rare—if one could suppose a man to retain his entire self-possession
while standing on the drop immediately before its falling, the thoughts which
would under such circumstances crowd on his mind, would necessarily be of a most
solemn nature. To think that he is this moment in perfect health—it may be in
the prime of life—and that the next his body will be a piece of inanimate
clay, and his spirit in the presence of the Supreme Being; to think that this
moment he is surrounded by his fellow-beings on earth, and the next will be
amidst the innumerable company of angels and the spirits of departed saints, or
else consigned to the abodes of everlasting despair,—these are thoughts which
are surely adapted, if anything could be, to [-263-] inspire
the mind with feelings of the deepest awe. Whatever may be the destiny of the
man who thus expires on the scaffold, how great and sudden must be the
transition he undergoes!
The
spectacle of the execution of a human being ought to be one of a deeply
affecting nature to all who behold it. It is so to every spectator of a well
regulated mind. To the vast majority, however, of those thousands who witness
such scenes, it has nothing affecting in it. They look upon it precisely in the
same light as if it were a drama got up for their special amusement. And rather
than be deprived of the sight they will pay for a view of it,—just as they
would for admission to a theatre. So early as five o’clock on an execution
morning, you will see crowds of persons trooping from all parts of the
metropolis towards the Old Bailey. The leading thoroughfares present continued
streams of them. They are, with very few exceptions, the most depraved and
the most criminal of the population. Their uproarious conduct, their shouts of
laughter, their vile expressions, their [-264-] imprecations on themselves and on each
other. all show that in the scale of morals they are but a few removes from the
brute creation.
The
scenes which used to be exhibited on the scaffold, were sometimes of a most
deeply touching nature, regarded merely in reference to this world. One who was
on the scaffold on the occasion of an execution for a very trifling felony,
lately mentioned to me that the unhappy man, on reaching the eminence from
whence he was to drop into eternity, said he had just one remaining wish
ungratified, and that was to get one last look of his wife before he died. He
added he was sure that no earthly power would have prevented her from being
among the crowd. As he uttered the words he looked eagerly around on the
assemblage. His eye, strange as it may seem, did actually recognise his wife; he
kissed his hand to her, gave her a most benignant smile, and looked up to heaven
as if invoking the Divine blessing on her behalf. He sobbed out to the Rev.
Gentleman who was present to administer the last offices of religion to [-265-] him,
that he could now die contented; in less than a minute his spirit was before the
throne of the Eternal.
Another
instance of a very affecting nature, arising also from the devoted attachment of
the prisoner to his wife, occurred some ten or twelve years since, in the case
of a member of the Society of Friends; the only one of their members, I may
mention as an act of justice to that excellent body of men, who had suffered on
the scaffold for a century before. The unfortunate individual in question was
executed for forgery. Immediately before the cap was put on his head, which, as
before stated, is among the last of the preparations for the awful impending
catastrophe, he desired the Rev. Ordinary to take from his pocket,—not being
able to do it himself in consequence of his hands being pinioned, —a farewell
letter he had received the previous evening from his wife. The Rev. Gentleman
having given him the letter, the unhappy man raised it with his pinioned hands
to his mouth, loaded it with the most affectionate kisses, and [-266-] then depositing
it in his bosom, gave the fatal signal, and in a few moments was in another
world.
Talk of
the romance of fiction! Will any one point out to me in the wide range of
fiction anything more deeply touching than the simple unvarnished incidents I
have mentioned in the two cases just given? Alas! that ever the laws or judges
of England, should have doomed such men to suffer an ignominious death for
offences of so trivial a nature!
Novelists
would occasionally find excellent materials for their works, in Newgate. I shall
only mention one strikingly romantic case which fell under the personal
observation of Mr. C an acquaintance of my own. About twelve years since, two
men were executed for uttering a 5l.
note, knowing it to be forged. My acquaintance happened to be present at the
execution. In the course of an hour or so after it was over, he chanced to meet
with a person he knew, with whom he entered into conversation on the subject of
the drama which had been enacted at [-267-] Newgate.
Mr. C had been expressing his regret at the unfortunate circumstance of two men
being doomed to lose their lives for the simple utterance of a forged 5l.
note the other treated the thing with levity, and indulged in a variety of
coarse unfeeling jokes on the subject. “Did they swing in excellent style? Did
their heels dangle nicely in the air ?“ he inquired. Mr. C—, in the first
instance, reproved him for his ill-timed jokes on so melancholy a subject. This
only made him worse. At length, worked up to a temporary excitement, my
acquaintance left the other quite hastily, telling him, as he quitted the house
in which they had met, that he had better take care lest he himself should share
the same fate as the two unfortunate men, before he quitted the world. Mr.
C—— soon after went to the country, and did not return to town for four
months. On his arrival, he heard that an execution was to take place the
following morning, but without being aware who the party was. He resolved on
being present. He was so. About an hour before
[-268-] the execution he went into the cell of the prisoner, accompanied by
several other persons. At first he did not recognise the prisoner; but he had
not been in the apartment many seconds, when the prisoner advanced to him, and
addressing him by his name, begged to be allowed to speak privately to him. The
governor of the place acceded to the prisoner’s request; but begged him to be
as quick as possible, as he had now so short a period to live. “Mr. C-,”
said he, “do you recollect when you and I met, in the Red Lion, a few months
ago?” Mr. C- answered in the affirmative. “And the nature of our
conversation?” Mr. C- said he did. “Well then, that evening I purchased of a
Jew, and uttered the flash five pound note for the utterance of which I am now
about to lose my life. I have been most earnestly desiring to see you to express
my deep regret for the improper language I made use of regarding the two men who
were then executed. I am now about to suffer for the very same offence.”
Of late,
as I shall afterwards have occasion [-269-] to state more particularly, there has not
been any great sacrifice of life at the Old Bailey. It was far different
formerly. From the middle of the last century downwards to a few years since,
the annals of our London criminal jurisprudence present us with one continued
stream of human blood. The executions have often in the course of that period
been between fifty and sixty per annum. The Bank of England alone could boast
– for there parties connected with that establishment who used to talk of the
thing if it had been a matter for boasted – the Bank could boast, year after
years, of sacrificing its thirty or forty victims to the forgery of its notes. I
know nothing more painful in British history, - or which ought to make us more
ashamed of our country – that the fact of so many of our fellow-men being
offered up to the Juggernaut of a sanguinary statute book. Laws are generally
supposed to be made for the protection of human life; for a course of years it
seemed as [-270-] if our laws had been made for its extinction. The destruction of life
in this country, and in the metropolis especially, was truly frightful. The most
trifling offences were punished with death. Even in cases where, morally, there
was no guilt at all, and where, even legally, every circumstance attendant on
the commission of the offence was in favour of the prisoner,—even in these
cases nothing would satisfy the Draconian spirit of our criminal jurisprudence,
but the life of the party. Who can look back on the execution of Dr. Dodd,
coupled with a knowledge of the circumstances under which at unfortunate man
suffered, without feelings of the deepest pain, and of shame for a country that
could have tolerated such things? Dr. Dodd merely forged the name of a nobleman
with whom he was on terms of the closest intimacy, for a small sum to meet some
pressing demand; and even this was done, not with the view of defrauding any
one, but under the most assured conviction, that by the time the bill had become
due, he would be able to meet it, and [-271-] consequently no one ever know anything
about it. Yet for
this offence our sanguinary laws were inexorable in demanding the life of the
unfortunate divine. Some time after came the execution of a poor woman, whose
melancholy story is so touchingly related in a speech for the modification of
our then criminal jurisprudence, by the late Sir William Meredith. She had gone
into a draper’s shop and had taken up, if I remember rightly, a small piece of
flannel, worth eighteen pence, which she intended to pawn for as much as would
purchase a fourpenny loaf of bread to save herself and her infant at the breast,
from starvation. What made the case of this poor woman the more affecting was,
that she was young and beautiful, was an entire stranger to crime, and had been
in comfortable circumstances, but had been reduced to utter destitution from the
circumstances of her husband having been seized by a press-gang, and put on
board a-man-of-war. Without entering into details, I may mention that the judges
of that period seemed to have such a penchant, as the French [-272-] say, for human
blood, that various cases of executions for stealing two or three penny tarts
from a confectioner’s shop, are on record. Not even youth was any protection
against the Draconian spirit of the laws and those entrusted with the
administration of them. For the most trivial acts of felony, mere boys were then
doomed to suffer on the scaffold. What must have been the constitution of the
minds of those judges who could sanction executions for such offences, it is
difficult to conceive, The very thought, one would suppose, that such things
should be, must have made every one shudder in whose breast there was left one
trace of humanity. And yet the judges of a former time could, so far as we are
aware, be parties to such transactions day after day, and year after year,
without one single compunctious visiting.
But a
better day has dawned on us. The rigour of our criminal code has been greatly
relaxed.
It is a
most gratifying circumstance that there have been so few executions in London of
late [-273-] years,
compared with the number at previous periods. With the single exception of one
unfortunate man who suffered in March last, there has been no execution in
London for four years past. This happy diminution in the number of executions is
principally owing to the recent alteration in the criminal code, which abolishes
capital punishments in the case of so many offences to which they were formerly
annexed. The result of the experiment made by the legislature as to the
efficiency of secondary punishments to repress crime—for I believe the
legislature only viewed the matter as an experiment— has been a complete
confirmation of the views of those philanthropic individuals who, for some years
previously, had laboured with a zeal and assiduity which exceed all praise, to
soften the rigours of our criminal code. I have here especially in my eye, the
“ Society for the Diffusion of Information on Capital Punishments.”
Circumstances have made me better acquainted with the labours of this Society
than the public generally can be, and I should not be doing jus-[-274-]tice to my own
feelings, did I not take this opportunity of expressing my conviction, that the
annals of benevolence afford but few parallels to the purity of motive in which
that Society had its origin, and to the untiring perseverance with which, for a
series of years, it laboured to promote its humane objects. It has always sought
to shun rather than to court the public gaze. If ever a Society did good by
stealth, it is the Society in question. It has pursued the quiet and even tenor
of its way, amidst circumstances of a most discouraging nature— so
discouraging, indeed, that nothing but the consciousness of being engaged in a
most righteous cause, could have supported it under them. The great truth which
this Society has laboured so earnestly to impress on the legislature and the
country, is, that putting out of view the injustice and inhumanity of sanguinary
punishments, a lenient criminal code is much better adapted to repress or
diminish crime. The result has most conclusively proved the truth of the
position. There has been a very great diminution in the number of those [-275-]offences
which, previous to the last few years, were punished with death, since the
alteration referred to came into operation. I intended to have gone into details
on this subject; but that would occupy too much space. It is, besides,
unnecessary, as the parliamentary returns in which the fact is established, are
already before the country. I may be told that this diminution in the number of
offences, formerly capital, but now no longer so, is to be ascribed to a
decrease of crime consequent on the improved circumstances of the country, and
that it is not the result of the greater efficiency of secondary punishments.
There is one very short but very conclusive answer to this: there has been in
the very same period an increase in all the minor offences, in other words, to
those to which the extreme penalty of the law was not before annexed. But,
therefore, for the superior efficacy of milder punishments, why should there not
have been a corresponding increase in the offences which were formerly capital?
But the
position that a lenient system of [-276-] criminal jurisprudence is more efficacious
than a sanguinary one, is as much in accordance with philosophy as it is with
experience. The injured party, under our previous Draconian code, rather, in
many cases, passively submitted to the injury than prosecute the offender, when
they knew that his death would be the result of a conviction. And juries, on the
same just and humane principle, hesitated to convict, even where the evidence
was quite conclusive. The consequence was, that the offender often escaped
altogether. Hence criminals, under the former system, speculated on the chances
of escaping punishment, even should they be detected in the commission of the
offence. This, of course, was holding out a strong temptation to crime. Now,
however, that the punishment is more proportioned to the crime, the injured
party have no scruples in prosecuting, and juries unhesitatingly convict where
the evidence is clear. Criminals, therefore, now know that they have no chance
of escape in so far as the prosecutor or the jury are concerned; they know that
their punish-[-277-]ment is certain; and the certainty,
not the severity of punishment,
has always been found to be the great preventive of crime. The history of all
other countries, as well as our own, in which the effect of sanguinary and
lenient punishments has been severally tried, concurs in proving that the latter
is most calculated to repress crime.
The
great argument urged by the advocates of capital punishments in favour of the
enforcement of the extreme penalty, has always been the necessity of an example.
The facts already stated, have abundantly proved that executions have never
operated in the way of salutary example; and a moment’s reflection might have
served to convince any one that they never could. The foot of the gallows is not
the place to learn one’s duty, either to the Deity or to society. The
spectacle of an execution necessarily tends to harden or brutalise the mind. All
experience shows, that the more a man becomes familiarised with death, under any
form, the less he thinks of it. In the case of [-278-] the spectator was always
withdrawn from the offence itself, to indulge in sympathy with the
offender,—he being regarded as a victim to a sanguinary system of criminal
jurisprudence. Even when the executions are for murder, those executions do not
operate by way of example. It is too notorious to be denied, that the utmost
levity is manifested by many of the spectators. Numbers of them, indeed, attend
those painful spectacles with no other view than that of picking pockets, or
otherwise practising their light-fingered profession.
The
scenes which were sometimes exhibited at the Old Bailey when our criminal code
existed in all its unmitigated rigour, were of the most shocking nature. On one
occasion, about twenty years since, no fewer than twenty-one human beings were
executed there on one morning, and all for secondary offences. Let any one only
fancy that he sees all those unfortunate persons suspended for an hour in the
air, in the midst of one of our most crowded thoroughfares, and he will be able
to form some idea of [-279-] what must have been the shock which every humane mind must
have received, who accidentally, or otherwise, was fated to witness so barbarous
a spectacle. It consists with my own private knowledge, that in some cases
strangers coming from the country, who knew nothing of there being executions at
the particular time, have had their feelings so shocked by suddenly witnessing
such sights, as never afterwards entirely to recover from the effects of the
scene. To me it appears as clear as any moral proposition can be, that
revelation, justice, humanity, and even social expediency, all loudly proclaim,
that no crime but that of wilfully taking the life of a fellow-creature, ought
to be punished with death. Whether even the murderer ought to die by the hands
of the executioner, is a question with many of the most excellent and
enlightened men in the country. They think that the Divine Being has never
delegated to man the right of shedding the blood of a fellow-man; and that
solitary imprisonment would answer all the ends of justice. On this point I
[-280-] will
express no opinion of my own, not being quite decided either way. It is one,
however, which is deserving the most serious attention of the legislature and
the country.
I cannot
close my chapter on Newgate, without a word or two respecting two of the leading
individuals connected with it. I allude to the Rev. Dr. Cotton, the Ordinary,
and Mr. Baker. Dr. Cotton is a man who is deeply imbued with the spirit of that
religion whose minister he is. There is something serious in his very
appearance. His countenance is grave, and his demeanour is of that nature which
becomes his sacred office. His white, long, flowing hair, coupled with his
advanced years, impart something of an unusually venerable aspect to his
appearance. He is indefatigable in his attention to the duties of his office;
and the respect with which he invariably inspires all who come in contact with
him, often procures him access to criminals who peremptorily refuse to admit of
the visits of other pious individuals. He has, there can be no question, [-281-] been
the means of doing much good within the walls of Newgate.
Of Mr. Baker I may say the same. His Christian philanthropy has been productive
of great spiritual benefit to the unhappy individuals who, since he began to
visit Newgate, have been sentenced to death. He is a man of a kind and
benevolent heart, and spares no amount of personal exertion where there is even
the chance of doing good. His manners are conciliatory in no ordinary degree,
and have often paved the way to the minds of culprits, when a sterner or more
unbending exhibition of conduct, would have failed to secure attention. He is
respected by all about the place, as well as by those of the unfortunate inmates
who have occasion to come in contact with him. He has been the instrument of
much spiritual good within the walls of Newgate: it is to be hoped he will yet
be the instrument of a great deal more. He is not officially connected with the
place; but performs all his labours gratuitously from the pure desire of doing
good.
[nb. grey numbers in
brackets indicate page number, (ie. where new page begins), ed.]