[back to menu for this book ...]
[-367-]
XXXII.
YELLOWKNIGHTS.
WHEN Roscius was an actor in Rome, I think it highly probable that private
theatricals, imitative of the performances of the great dramatic exemplar of the
day, were a highly popular amusement among the juvenile Roman aristocracy. It is
pleasant as well as reasonable to think so. if would have given something to
have been able to witness such a celebration in the great city of men; and that
such sights often took place I have very small doubts. That amiable system of
classical education under which you and I, my dear Hopkins, were reared, but
which our sons, let us hope, will mercifully escape—that grand scheme of
grammatical tuition which held chief among its axioms that the mind of youth,
like a walnut-tree, must be quickened by blows in its advances to maturity; that
the waters of Helicon were not wholesome unless duly mingled with brine; and
that the birch and the bays were inextricably interwoven in the poetical chaplet—that
system, I say, taught us (among irreproachable quantities and symmetrical feet)
to look upon everything appertaining to Rome and the Romans with something very
much akin to horror; to regard Plautus as a bugbear and Terence. as a tyrant; to
remember nothing of Horace but the portrait of his schoolmaster—nothing of
Virgil but the cruel memory of Juno. But now that a new generation has grown up,
and we ourselves (according to an ingenious theory some time propounded) have
changed our cuticle, and have had provided for us a new set of viscera, we can
afford to look back without bitterness or regret, without fear or trembling,
upon the old days of verbum personale and studio grammaticoe.
Queer days! They would have flogged us for reading Mr. Macaulay’s ‘Lays,’
and caned us had we looked upon Lemprière, not as a dull book of reference, but
as the most charming collection of fairy tales in the world. Now all our gerunds
and. supines, our dactyls and spondees, our subjects and attributes, our
hexameters and pentameters, are mingled in a pleasant jumble of dreamy memories:
now that we quite forget what took place in the thirty-sixth Olympiad, and don’t
know the names [-368-] of the forty tyrants, and
can’t rememumber the value of an As or the number of stadia between Rome and
Capri (I speak for myself, Hopkins)—we can indulge in the fancy that the
Romnans were not at all times frowning, awful spectres, with hook-noses,
laurel-bound brows, and flowing togas, incessantly occupied in crossing the
Rubicon, subduing the Iceni, reviewing the tenth legion, striking Medusalike
medals, standing behind chairs with hatchets and bundles of rods, or marching
about with S. P. Q. R. stuck on the top of a pole. Cicero pleaded against Verres,
but there were other advocates to plead in the cause of a countryman’s pig.
The geese were not always saving the Capitol—'bo' must have been occasionally
said to them, and they eaten with sage and onions sometimes. The Cumaean sybil
must have taken a little snack on her tripod from time to time. Maecenas must
have made jokes, great Caesar stooped to pun, and stern Brutus played with his
children. Yes; among all this solemn bigwiggery — these triumphs, ovations,
sacrifices, orations (in which a tremendous amount of false Latin was talked,
you may be sure), there must have been a genial, social, homely, comic element
among the Roman citizens. Who shall say that there were not Cockney Romans who
pronounced vir, wir, and dropped the H in Horrida? Who shall say that
there were no games at blindman’s-buff, forfeits, and hunt the slipper, on
long winter evenings, in the great Consular families; that there was no kissings
under the mistletoe in the entertainments of the Roman knights; that there were
no private theatricals, blithesome, ridiculous, and innocent., what time Roscius
was an actor in Rome?