If you enjoy www.victorianlondon.org why not ...
[... back to menu for this book]
[-172-]
CHAPTER XXII.
PENNY READINGS.
WHO has ever penetrated beneath the surface of
clerical society - meaning thereby the sphere of
divinities (mostly female) that doth hedge a curate
of a parish - without being sensible of the eligibility
of Penny Readings for a place in Mystic London?
When the Silly Season is at its very bathos; when
the monster gooseberries have gone to seed and the
showers of frogs ceased to fall; after the matrimonial
efforts of Margate or Scarborough, and before the
more decided business of the Christmas Decorations,
then there is deep mystery in the penetralia of every
parish. The great scheme of Penny Readings is
being concocted, and all the available talent of the
district - all such as is "orthodox" and " correct" - is
laid under contribution.
It is true to a proverb that we English people have
a knack of doing the best possible things in the worst
possible way; and that not unfrequently when we do
once begin doing them we do them to death. It
takes some time to convince us that the particular
thing is worth doing at all; but, once persuaded, we
go in for it with all our British might and main. [-173-]
The beard-and-moustache movement was a case in
point. Some years ago a moustache was looked upon
by serious English people as decidedly reckless and
dissipated. A beard was fit only for a bandit. Nowadays,
the mildest youth in the Young Men's
Christian Association may wear a moustache without
being denounced as "carnal," and paterfamilias revels
in the beard of a sapeur, no misopogon daring to say
him nay. To no "movement," however, does the
adage " Vires acquirit eundo" apply more thoroughly
than to that connected with " Penny Readings."
Originally cropping up timidly in rustic and suburban
parishes, it has of late taken gigantic strides, and
made every parish where it does not exist, rural or
metropolitan, very exceptional indeed. There was a
sound principle lying at the bottom of the movement,
in so far as it was designed to bring about a fusion of
classes ; though, perhaps, it involved too much of an
assumption that the "working man" had to be lectured
to, or read to, by his brother in purple and fine
linen. Still the theory was so far sound. Broad
cloth was to impart to fustian the advantages it possessed
in the way of reading, singing, fiddling, or
what not; and that not gratuitously, which would
have offended the working man's dignity, but for the
modest sum of one penny, which, whilst Lazarus was
not too poor to afford, Dives condescended to accept,
and apply to charitable purposes.
Such being, in brief, the theory of the Penny
[-174-]
Reading movement, it may be interesting to see how
it is carried out in practice. Now, in order to ascertain
this, I availed myself of several opportunities
afforded by the commencement of the Penny Reading
season, which may be said to synchronize very nearly
with the advent of London fogs, and attended the
opening of the series in several widely different localities.
In describing my experiences it would perhaps
be invidious to specify the exact locality where they
were gathered. I prefer to collate those experiences
which range from Campden Hill to Camden Town
inclusive. Amid many distinguishing traits there
are common elements traceable in all, which may
enable us to form some estimate of the working of the
scheme, and possibly to offer a few words of advice to
those interested therein.
In most cases the Penny Readings are organized
by the parochial clergy. We will be orthodox, and
consider them so to be on the present occasion. In
that case, the series would probably be opened by the
incumbent in person. Some ecclesiastical ladies,
young and middle-aged, who, rightly or wrongly,
believe their mission is music, and to whom the
curate is very probably an attraction, aid his efforts.
Serious young men read, and others of a more mundane
turn of mind sing doleful "comic" songs, culled
from the more presentable of the music-hall répertoire.
In many cases skilled amateurs or professionals lend
their valuable assistance; and it is not too much to
[-175-]
say that many a programme is presented to the
audience - ay, and faithfully carried out too -which
would do credit to a high-priced concert-room. But,
then, who make up the audience? Gradually the
"penny" people have been retiring into the background,
as slowly but as surely as the old-fashioned
pits at our theatres are coyly withdrawing under
the boxes to make way for the stalls. The Penny
Readings have been found to "draw" a higher class
of audience than those for whom they were originally
intended. The curate himself, if unmarried, secures
the whole spinsterhood of the parish. His rendering
of the lines, "On the receipt of my mother's picture
out of Norfolk," is universally acknowledged to be
"delightful;" and so, in course of time, the Penny
Readings have been found to supply a good parochial
income ; and the incumbent, applying the proceeds
to some local charity, naturally wishes to augment
that income as much as possible. The consequence
is that the penny people are as completely nowhere
at the Penny Readings as they are in the free seats
at their parish church. The whole of the body of
the room is "stalled off," so to say, for sixpenny
people, and the penny folk are stowed away anywhere.
Then, again, in several programmes I have been at
the pains to analyse, it is palpable that, whilst the
bulk of the extracts fire over the heads of the poor
people, one or two are inserted which are as studiously
aimed at them as the parson's remarks in last
[-176-]
Sunday's sermon against public-house loafing. Still
"naming no names," I attended some readings where
one of the clergy read a long extract from Bailey's
"Festus," whilst he was succeeded by a vulgar fellow,
evidently put in for "the gods," who delivered himself
of a parody on Ingoldsby, full of the coarsest
slang - nay, worse than that, abounding in immoralities
which, I hope, made the parochial clergy sit
on thorns, and place the reader on their "Index
Expurgatorius" from henceforth.
Excellent in its original design, the movement is
obviously degenerating into something widely different.
First, I would say, Let your Penny Readings
be really Penny Readings, and not the egregious
lucus a non they now are. If there is any distinction,
the penny people should have the stalls, and then, if
there were room, the "swells" (I must use an offensive
term) could come in for sixpence, and stand at the
back. But there should be no difference at all. Dives
and Lazarus should sit together, or Dives stop away
if he were afraid his fine linen may get soiled. Lazarus,
at all events, must not be lost sight of, or treated
to second best. The experiment of thus mingling
them has been tried, I know, and succeeds admirably.
Dives and Lazarus do hobnob ; and though the
former occasionally tenders a silver coin for his
entry, he does not feel that he is thereby entitled to
a better seat. The committee gets the benefit of his
liberality; and when the accounts are audited in the
[-177-]
spring, Lazarus is immensely pleased at the figure his
pence make. Then, again, as to the quality of the
entertainment. Let us remember Lazarus comes
there to be elevated. That was the theory we set out
with - that we, by our reading, or our singing, or
fiddling, or tootle-tooing on the cornet, could civilize
our friend in fustian. Do not let us fall into the
mistake, then, of descending to his standard. We
want to level him up to ours. Give him the music
we play in our own drawing-rooms; read the choice
bits of fiction or poetry to his wife and daughters
which we should select for our own. Amuse his poor
little children with the same innocent nonsense with
which we treat our young people. Above all, don't
bore him. I do not say, never be serious, because it
is a great mistake to think Lazarus can only guffaw.
Read "The Death of Little Nell" or of Paul Dombey,
and look at Mrs. Lazarus's eyes. Read Tom Hood's
"Song of the Shirt," and see whether the poor seamstress
out in the draughty penny seats at the back
appreciates it or not. I did hear of one parish at the
West End - the very same. by the way, I just now
commended for sticking to the "penny" system where
Hood's "Nelly Gray," proposed to be read by
the son of one of our best known actors, was tabooed
as "unedifying." Lazarus does not come to be
"edified," but to be amused. If he can be at the
same time instructed, so much the better ; but the
bitter pill must be highly gilded, or he will pocket
[-178-]
his penny and spend it in muddy beer at the public-house.
If the Penny Reading can prevent this -and
we see no reason why it should not - it will have had
a mission indeed. Finally, I feel sure that there is in
this movement, and lying only a very little way from
the surface, a wholesome lesson for Dives too; and
that is, how little difference there is, after all, between
himself and Lazarus. I have been surprised to see
how some of the more recherché "bits" of our
genuine humorists have told upon the penny people,
and won applause which the stalest burlesque pun or
the nastiest music-hall inanity would have failed to
elicit. Lazarus must be represented on the platform
then, as well as comfortably located in the audience.
He must be asked to read, or sing, or fiddle, or do
whatever he can. If not, he will feel he is being
read at, or sung to, or fiddled for, and will go off to
the Magpie and Stump, instead of bringing missus
and the little ones to the "pa'son's readings." Let
the Penny Reading teach us the truth - and how true
it is - that we are all "working men." What matters
it whether we work with head or with hand - with.
brain or muscle?