see also Richard Rowe in Life in the London Streets - click here
The nobility and gentry —not 'of
the Walworth road'; as Mr. Gerridge, the gasfitter, has it in Caste—but of
Victoria Street, Westminster, are up in arms against the proposed construction
of tramways through that imposing but still incomplete thoroughfare; and a
committee, numbering over one hundred and twenty influential inhabitants of the
locality, has been formed to oppose the threatened invasion of street cars.
Earls, architects, C.E.’s, F.G.S’s, MA’s, MD’s, M.P.’s, CB’s, and
Mr. Arthur Sullivan are on the committee.
Moreover, a highly representative meeting has been held at
Tattersall’s, at which resolutions were moved strongly condemnatory of the
scheme of running continuous tramways from Victoria Street, through Pimlico, up
Sloane Street (dear old Sloane Street Cagliostro lived there once, and sold
pills of long life), by Knightsbridge and Kensington Gore, through High Street,
Kensington, to Hammersmith; and, if to Hammersmith, why not to Turuham Green, to
Chiswick, to Row Bridge, to Richmond, Twickenham, and Brentford? Imagine the
Three Kings of Brentford all coming to town in one tram-car! ‘Rien n’est
sacré pour un sapeur!’ the brazen Thérèse used to sing. Nor does there
appear to be much that is sacred to a tramway company.
There can be scarcely any doubt that, at the West End,
tramways would be an intolerable nuisance. The lovely drive to Richmond would be
spoilt, as the drive to Greenwich has been spoilt, by these subversive aids to
locomotion. The shopkeepers of Oxford Street are being menaced with a tramway.
Take care. More than the thin end of the wedge has been inserted; and ere long
Regent Street may be threatened, and Piccadilly find itself in peril.
On the other hand, I rode recently from Lamb’s Conduit
Fields to the Standard Theatre in Shoreditch, through that prodigious
thoroughfare from west to east, which has been opened up by the Metropolitan
Board of Works, A great portion of the road is laid with tramways; and there can
be no doubt that in these far outlying, densely populated, and incessantly busy
districts tramways are a distinct boon and blessing.
I remembered, driving home, that, some months ago, I had at a
certain town hall taken the chair at a public meeting, held in advocacy of the
extension of tramways westward from the New Clerkenwell Road to Theobald’s
Road. It rarely passed a wore diverting evening. It was a little exciting, too.
There was a strong anti-tramway party at the back of the hall, who persistently
yelled ‘Free streets!' and’ It’s a put-up job!' Towards the close
of the evening the anti-tramway party tried to storm the platform, with the
avowed object of ‘smashing the chairman.’ One burly gentleman, whose
vocation, seemingly, was that of a brewer’s drayman, made desperate efforts to
scale the stairs of the platform, shouting, ‘ Let me git at the willin’ in
the vile veskit. On’y let me git at the willin’ in the vite veskit!’ I was
the villain in the objectionable vest. There was a little old lady, too, in a
red shawl, who, standing just in front of me, shook her fist implacably, shrilly
expressing her fixed belief that I was ‘one of them Jesuits,’ and openly
declaring her ardent desire to ‘lam’ me. What is it to be ‘lammed’?
George Augustus Sala Living London 1882
A SONG OF SOUTH LONDON
AIR - "Mary had a little Lamb."
LONDON had a demon Tram,
Huge, lumbering, noisy, slow;
And everywhere that London went,
That Tram was sure to go.
An Ogre-pet, a Frankenstein;
Where'er man's footsteps fell
Was heard the thunder of its tramp,
The tinkling of its bell.
Oh, Nature! your so vaunted course
Is surely but a sham,
You "bring not back the Mastodon,"
But will you take the Tram?
Punch, February 17, 1883