[-289-] CHAPTER IX.
BARTHOLOMEW AND GREENWICH FAIRS.
Prefatory remarks—Bartholomew Fair—The numbers which
attend it—Descriptive observations— Greenwich Fair—The numbers which
frequent it—The voyage downward—Throwing the stick, and other games—The
park—The hill— Blackheath —The appearance of the Fair—Supply of
commodities—Exhibitions—Theatres—Gamblers, and
gaming—Swings—Booths—Immoral tendency of the Fair.
THE Fairs in London and its vicinity are still important
affairs, though not so much so as formerly, in the estimation of the working
classes of the metropolis; and any work, professing to treat of Babylonian life
and habits, which did not embrace this subject, would be manifestly incomplete.
Some years ago, there were a greater number of fairs in the
metropolis and its suburbs, than there are at present. The two of greatest note
which now exist, are Bartholomew and Greenwich Fairs. A few years ago, there
were Bow Fair, Stepney Fair, Edmonton Fair, and Brook-green Fair, besides one or
two others of minor interest. These fairs have all been done away with by the
civil authorities, in consequence of the injury to public morals which resulted
from them. On this last point I shall make a few observations in the conclusion
of the chapter.
Bartholomew fair, or Bartlemy Fair, as the cockneys call
it, once every year. It takes place in September, in Smithfield market, which is
in the very heart of London, and is opened with great pomp and circumstance by
the Lord Mayor and others of the city authorities. It always lasts three days.
During each of these days, it is numerously attended; but the second day is
usually the best, both with respect to the numbers who attend, and the spirit
with which matters are conducted.
Among the lower classes of London, the return of
Bartholomew Fair is looked forward to with great interest and anxiety. The
numbers of both sexes—I am not sure whether there be not more females than our
sex—which attend this fair, must appear incredible to those who have not been
made acquainted with the fact from personal observation. I am convinced I am
[-290-] under the mark, when I say that 100,000 persons are present each of the three
days, from two to eight o’clock; and if to these be added, those who visit the
Fair for an hour or two only, and then quit it, I am satisfied the number who
have been at the Fair, each of the three days, is above, rather than below,
150,000. That I may not be suspected of exaggeration in this estimate, it may be
proper to mention, that Smithfield-market embraces a space equal to nearly five
acres. Let the reader be informed, that not only is this extensive space so
densely crowded with human beings, that they have the appearance of a solid
mass, but that the Fair, or, at any rate, the crowd of persons, extends itself
some distance up all the streets which lead into the marketplace: let him only
be informed of this, and he will, in all probability, come to the conclusion
that I have considerably underrated, rather than over-estimated, the numbers who
patronize Bartholomew Fair.
It is here, perhaps, worthy of a passing remark, that the
very spot on which Bartholomew Fair, with all its fun and frolic, is held, is
the very spot on which blazed the fires of Smithfield which consumed so many
distinguished Protestant martyrs, two centuries ago. Who can help being struck
with the difference between the purpose to which Smithfie1d~market then was, and
now is, applied!
To enumerate the amusements provided for the holiday
cockneys at Bartholomew Fair were a hopeless task: they are legion itself.
Everything that can please the palate, delight the eye, or gratify the ear, is
there to be seen or heard. The “ shows,” or exhibitions on a larger scale,
have all their bands of music; while inside, you’ll see “sich vonders as no
von ever saw afore.” In the sweetmeat and toy departments of the Fair, the
variety and abundance are so great that you are quite confounded with the scene.
I have heard a young man ask his sweetheart what she would like, pointing to a
stall on which were displayed, in rich abundance and most tempting condition,
sweetmeats innumerable; and I have seen her so completely at a loss to make up
her mind as to which she would prefer, that the fable of the ass perishing of
hunger between the two bundles of hay has come across my mind with a force I
have very rarely known it do on any other occasion. In fact, it is no uncommon
thing, in such circumstances, for the lover to be obliged to decide, as. well as
to, pay for the object of his affections.
I pass over the leading features of Bartholomew Fair,
because the remarks and statements I shall have to make when, speaking of
Greenwich Fair, will equally, or in a very great measure, apply to it. The most
marked difference, perhaps, between the two fairs, consists in the circumstance
of Greenwich Fair being [-291-] most liberally supplied with dancing booths, while
Bartholomew Fair has no such attraction for the youths of the metropolis. A
substitute, however, is found in the large rooms of some of the neighbouring
public-houses.
For the reason just mentioned, I now quit Bartholomew Fair,
and proceed to its rival at Greenwich. The latter fair is not nearly so
numerously attended; a circumstance which is at once accounted for from the fact
of its being four or five miles distant from the centre of London. As far as I
can ascertain from the imperfect data accessible to me, I should represent the
number of persons who usually attend Greenwich Fair as somewhere about 50,000;
full 40,000 of which number, I should suppose, are visitors from London.
Formerly, there were only two modes of conveyance to Greenwich—the steamers
and the turnpike-road: now there are three, the railway having been opened
upwards of a year since. Before the opening of the railway, there were always a
great many pedestrians to be seen on the road to Greenwich Fair: now, there are.
very few. Scarcely any now go by the usual coaches. It was calculated that, at
last Easter F air, the number who went and returned by the railway, and the
number that patronized the steamers, was pretty equal; giving, on my estimate,
about 20,000 to each. The journey down to Greenwich is always an important
affair in the estimation of the patrons of the Fair.
No one can form any idea of the sights which are to be
witnessed, and the occurrences which take place, at our metropolitan fairs, who
has not been present at them. Bow Fair, Stepney Fair, and several other fairs I
had seen when they existed; Bartaiolomew Fair I had been at on two occasions;
but, until last Easter Monday, I had never visited Greenwich Fair. Anxious to
describe what had come under my own eye, instead of trusting to the
representations of others, I that day started for Greenwich, at four o’clock
in the afternoon. On passing down Cannon Street, the first thing which attracted
my attention was an athletic, surly, hodman-looking personage, walking backwards
and forwards, placarded before and behind with immensely large sheets of paper
affixed to boards, and on which were the words, in most gigantic letters,
“Greenwich Fair.”—” Greenwich Fair, Sir?” “Greenwich Fair,
Ma’am?” growled the bearer of these prodigious placards, as he looked into
the face of every person whom he deemed likely to be on his or her way thither.
“Has the vessel yet started?” I inquired, as he
accosted me with his everlasting “ Greenwich Fair, Sir?”
“Not yet, Sir; but the’r a-going directly,” he
answered; adding, “This way, Sir; down this lane, Sir" pointing to a lane, the
name of which I forget.
[-292-] “Are there no vessels to be had at the usual place?” I
inquired, still proceeding in the direction of London Bridge.
“This is the way to the vessels, Sir,” was the reply,
from one, again pointing down the lane,
“But I’ll get a vessel, won’t I, at the usual place
?‘
“I assure you, Sir, the vessels are here,” was the
answer. I saw at once how the matter stood, and was pleased to find,
notwithstanding the placard-bearer’s forbidding look and rude manner, he had
such a perception of the moral beauty of truth, as to resist the temptation to
tell a fib.
“You don’t mean to say,” I repeated, “that there
are no vessels to Greenwich to be had at the Bridge?”
“Vy, Sir, I have already given you my vord, that the
wessels are down this ‘ere vay.” Again his hand pointed in the old
direction.
“Woy, yes, Zur,” said a waggon-driver, with a short
smockfrock, a dove-tailed hat, and half-boots with immensely thick soles, who
was standing at the time at the door of an adjoining wine-vaults, with a pot of
Whitbread and Co.’s Entire in his hand; “Woy, yes, Zur, there’ be lots on
‘em at the bridge; but you see, Zur, as how there be two companies, vich be
a-cuttin’ o’ one another’s throats. That’s how it is, Zur.”
“Oh, I see,” said I ; “and that, I suppose, is –“
I was interrupted by the placard-bearer observing, with
great earnestness, “Yes, Sir; but our wessels only charges sixpence, and the
other coves charges ninepence. We be the hopposition, Sir. I’m sure you’ll
go on one of our ‘uns.”
The latter sentence was delivered in a tone and manner so
very winning, and so unlike anything which one could have expected from a person
whose physiognomy was so unprepossessing, that there was no resisting it.
One of the vessels was just on the eve of starting as I got
on board: in other words, “the steam was up.” On various occasions I have
seen steam vessels, when on pleasure trips, sufficiently crowded. In July, last
year, I sailed round the Isle of Wight in a steam-vessel much more crowded than
I should like to see again on a similar occasion; but never did I see such a
dense mass of human beings on the deck of any vessel, as I witnessed on this
Greenwich steamer. It was with difficulty that those who were the last to go on
board could procure standing-room. As for walking about on the deck, that was
out of the question. The sailors, if the term be not a misnomer as applied to
those who conduct steam-vessels down the river to Greenwich and back again, had
literally, when working the vessel, to elbow their way through the crowd of
passengers on deck.
And then the miscellaneous character of these passengers.
[-293-] There you saw a bevy of young dandies, as prim and spruce as it were possible to
imagine, puffing cigars, and ogling the girls around them. Of dress-makers’
apprentices there seemed a fair sprinkling, and of male apprentices to various
trades there was no lack; but the preponderance of the passengers were clearly
journeymen mechanics and kitchen-maids. You would have fancied, to see the
swarms of the latter who found their way to Greenwich on Easter Monday, that
every kitchen in London had emptied itself of its biped contents. Some of them
had their sweethearts; others had evidently gone on spec.—that is to say,
trusting to meet by chance with some of their male acquaintances, either there
or on their way thither or home again. You saw small colonies of Sallys in every
part of the vessel. The remains of kitchen smoke which were visible about some
of their caps or bonnets, and the patches of what is, I believe, technically
called “black,” which still graced their physiognomies, told, in language
not to be mistaken, what were the avocations of a large proportion of the
females on deck. But if any one could have been so slow to learn as not to have
been instructed by what he saw around him, his ears must have come to his aid,
and performed an office in which his eyes had so unaccountably failed; for every
word they exchanged with each other smacked of the kitchen. There were the usual
number of “La’s !“ “Well, I never—” seemed to be perpetually on
their lips; while the invariable mode of resenting, or appearing to resent, the conduct of
the young men, when the latter were amusing themselves at their expense, was by
giving them a gentle slap on the face, and shouting out, with a shrillness of
pronunciation peculiar to those who grace the kitchen—” A-done!” If one
Sally asked another Sally what she thought of some male acquaintance whose name
was mentioned, the sure answer was, turning up her nose as she spoke, with a
view to express disdain—” Oh, shocking! I can’t a-bear him.” “How do
you like that gown which that young ooman sitting opposite there has on?”
“Oh, shocking! I can’t a-bear it.” Then there was an endless mention of
the name of “Missis.” “Missis was so cross yen I sought leave to—day
;“ “Missis is such a rum ‘un ;“ “ Missis is so difficult to please ;“ “Missis says she von’t allow no follo’rs; but I
contrives to see Tom Toggs for all that.”
In the voyage downwards, nothing
particular took place. The only occurrence worthy of mention was that of a young
man’s hat having fallen off his head while looking over the side of the
vessel. The general laughter which followed must have been very annoying to the
poor fellow, considering at the same time the loss of the hat, and the
inconvenience of having his head exposed all the way to a very cold
north-easterly wind. Besides, who could [-294-] tell whether the unlucky wight had
“the wherewith,” as one of the passengers suggested, to get another? My
hypothesis, judging from his appearance, was, that his coffers were by no means
abundantly replenished with the circulating medium. Be this as it may, he was
doomed to experience the truth of the old adage, that evils do not come alone. I
have mentioned a couple of the evils which on this occasion simultaneously befel
this young man: the evils, namely, of losing his hat, and then having his ears
assailed with a loud and universal laugh from his fellow-voyagers to Greenwich
at the occurrence of the calamity. A third evil was in store for him, which was
that of the disaster being converted into a subject of wit at his expense by
every person on board who could say, or imagined he could say, a clever thing on
the impulse of the moment. “Why don’t you take off your hat?” said one, in
a gruff grunting sort of voice. A roar of laughter followed. “Wy doan’t you
put it on, old ‘un ~“ said another small, shrill, squeaking voice, the
proprietor of which was evidently a tailor. The laughter was renewed with
additional vigour. The dying lion felt more mortified at being kicked by the
donkey, than regret at the mere circumstance of dying; and surely the fact of
being made the butt of a tailor’s jokes must have been to this poor fellow
more annoying by far than even the loss of his hat. Another passenger inquired
whether the hat was “a vashing beaver von ?“ while a fourth inquired whether
it was “a gossamer ventilator ?“ Loud laughter followed each of the
witticisms which were levelled at the unfortunate young man through means of his
lost hat. It was easy to perceive that he was inwardly wishing that some
half-dozen or so of his tormentors were in the same locality as his chapeau,
namely, either at the bottom of the Thames, or on their way to it.
So much for the voyage downwards. “Going down,” as it
is called, whether by the river, the railway, or the road, is considered by all
the patrons of the fair as an essential part of the day’s gratifications. On
debarking—to keep up the nautical phraseology—we were furnished with
abundant earnests of the amusements which awaited those who were disposed to
enjoy them. The game of throwing the stick seemed to be an especial favourite
with the holiday people: it was prosecuted with a vigour which I have never seen
equalled. Within one hundred yards from the landing-place, there were at least
forty proprietors of “the holes and the sticks,” and all of them appeared to
be driving a most extensive business: judging from what I saw, I should add that
they were doing a profitable one also; for out of about thirty throws, I only
observed the player win once.
As the game of throwing the stick is unknown in many parts
of the country, I shall describe it in as few words as possible.
[-295-] The persons who attend the fair for the purposes dig three
holes, each about half a, foot in diameter, in the ground; and in each of these
holes place a stick, three, or three and a half feet in height. The sticks are
each about one yard distant from the other, and on the top of each stick is
placed a. snuff-box, a pen-knife~ or some other trinket, whose nominal value is
from sixpence to a shilling, but which only costs the proprietor of “the
stand~ three or four pence. Any one who chooses to try for either of the
articles on the tops of the sticks, is allowed to do so on the payment of a
penny. For this “small sum of one penny” he gets three chances, or throws;
three sticks, about two and a half feet in length, being put into his baud for
the purpose. The particular part from which he is to throw is duly marked out
for him, which is eighteen or twenty feet from the sticks themselves. Those who
have never seen the thing played before, eagerly purchase their “pennyworth of
chances,” fancying that they have only to hit the sticks and knock down the
articles on the top of them, to entitle themselves to the articles so knocked
down. I was amused with a countryman of my own, at the last Greenwich Fair, in
connexion with this throwing the stick. He had evidently never seen anything of
the kind before, and had all the appearance 0f being a recent importation from the other side of the
Tweed. “Try a penny’orth, Sir,”—for the poorest and most homely dressed
persons are all “Sirs” to the owners of the sticks and holes;—” Try a
penny’orth, Sir, o’ them ‘ere sticks,” said one of these personages to
poor Sawney, who had the appearance of a. gardeners as he stood by, looking with
great simplicity at the three articles on the tops of the sticks.
“Can I try at ony ane I like?” inquired the Scotchman, looking at the sticks
which were proffered him, but not withdrawing his hands from his trousers’ pockets, where they were most probably
“gripping” what little “siller” be possessed.
“O, certainly,” answered the other, who was a little thick-set, sly-looking
personage.
“May I airoh (throw) at the middle ane wi’ the snuff-mull on the top
o’t?” asked the Caledonian. “At any one you like,” replied the other, not very clearly
comprehending the import of the terms “airch” and “mull.”
”Weel, then,” said my countryman, withdrawing his bands from his pockets,
and holding them out to receive the three sticks; “wed, then, here’s the
penny, and gie’s the rungs.£
“Jist ha’d oot o’ the way there,” said the Scotchman, with a rich
Paisley brogue, addressing himself to some boys who stood rather near the
sticks; “jist ha’d oot o’ the way there for a
minit, and I’ll soon bring the snuff-mull doon’
[-296-] The Scotchman threw his “rung,” as he called it, and
sure enough he hit the stick and down fell the snuff-box in the hole.
“Jist gie me my mull; I was sure I would knock it
doon,” said Sawney to the proprietor of the stand.
“ It’s in the hole, Upon my soul,” said the other,
taking up the snuff-box and replacing it on the
top of the stick. “You must make it fall on the
ground,” he continued.
“Awa wi’ ye’re nonsense; nae matter whar it fa’s,
so as it’s fairly knocked doon; fetch it to me,” observed the Scotchman.
“No, no,” said the other; “that would never do.”
The Caledonian grumbled and disputed for some time; but on
being assured by the bystanders that such was the invariable practice, he at
last reluctantly relinquished what he had thought his righteous claim to the
snuff-box.
“Try again, Sir; per’aps you’ll be more luckier next
time’
Sawney did as he was bid by the proprietor of the
“mulls” and the knives and the sticks, and “airched” a second time but
the “rung” missed.
“Third time’s always more luckier than a first or
second,” suggested tbe other.
The Scotchman threw a third time, and hit the stick; down,
of course, went the snuff-box.
The usnal couplet,
“ It’s in the hole,
Upon my soul,”
again greeted the ears of the unfortunate speculator.
“Try another penny’orth,” said the proprietor,
coaxingly holding out the three sticks again to Sawney. The latter hesitated for
a few moments, and then dragged out another penny from his pocket; in
consideration of which he received the trio of “rungs” which had already
proved such traitors to him. Again he threw them, but with no better success
than before.
“Can’t always win, Sir (though the poor fellow had not
won at all); there’s a lucky penny’orth this time. Sure to win the third
time,” said the cunning rogue, in most coaxing accents, who had fleeced him,
as he again presented to him the three sticks.
“Awa wi’ them! awa wi’ them!” said Sawney,
indignantly turning away his head from the “rungs,” just as a patient does
from some nauseous medicine.
“There’s luck in odd numbers, Sir; the third time’s
sure to gain, Sir,” continued the other, still pressing the penny’orth of
sticks on the Caledonian.
[-297-] “Get ye gone, ye cheating rascal !“ shouted the
Scotchman, now losing all temper with the loss of his twopence; “if ye offer
me your rungs again, I’ll break them o’er your back.”
It is needless to say, that the sticks were not again
offered to Sawney; their proprietor addressed his solicitations to try their
luck, to ether greenhorns of whom there was no lack.
I was struck with the fact, that the great majority of the
newcomers proceeded as if by a kind of instinct to the Park. One thing which
might of itself have attracted a large number of persons to this classic ground,
was the loud unintelligible noise which a woman was making within a. few yards
of the gate. The cause of the noise, as well as the words she uttered—if words
they could be called, which nobody could understand until when it they got quite
near to her— was a profound mystery when it first entered the ears of the
visitors. The most natural hypothesis, had there been a disposition to speculate
as to the cause of the strange sounds which this woman emitted, would have been,
that some one had been either murdered or dangerously and that such unfortunate
person was lying dead or damaged at her feet; for while speaking, or rather
vociferating, she held her right hand in a. slanting direction upwards in the
air, while with her left she steadily pointed to something on the ground. The
singularity of her attitude was still further increased by the stooping position
in which she stood. The very moment I saw her, she brought forcibly to my mind
the late Mr. Thelwall in one of the attitudes in which he always put himself
when wishing, in his lectures on oratory, to convey to the minds of his audience
some idea of the way in which Mark Antony delivered his funeral oration over the
dead body of Caesar. My surprise, and the surprise of others who, like myself,
had been attracted to the spot by the mysterious sounds, may be imagined, when,
on advancing towards the place where she stood, surrounded by a seemingly very
attentive audience, I found the subject of her vehement oratory was—a sack of
nuts which had been spread out on a piece of canvass on the ground! Who could
refrain from a hearty laugh, when finding the reality so very different from
what any one could have expected? Had I guessed till the crack of doom, before
quitting the place in which I first heard the noise, what the cause of that
noise was, I am perfectly certain I should never have come to the conclusion
that it was the woman’s vehement commendation of some two or three bushels of
nuts. “Here they are fresh good full sweet a penny a half-pint from the bag
this morning best sort not a bad ‘un among the lot,” was the favourite
eulogium which this nut-vender pronounced on her commodities! And she sometimes
delivered the whole encomium without drawing her breath, and therefore [-298-] all the
words appeared, as they came from her lips, as if incorporated with each other.
In fact, her panegyric on the superior qualities of her nuts looked, in some
cases, as if all the above words had been but one. The next time, again, in
which she repeated her praises of her goods, she pronounced the words so slowly
and distinctly, resembling a sort of chaunt, that you would have fancied no two
of them had any connexion together. They were uttered thus:
“Here—they—are—fresh— good—full—sweet—a—penny—
a—half—pint-—from—the—bag —this—morning—best—sort
—not—a—bad—’un— among—the —lot.” And what rendered the whole
affair the more extraordinary, was, the singular manner in which, in her more
energetic moments, she howled out the praises of her nuts. She reminded me of
the wild sounds which the Bedouin Arabs were in the habit of uttering when
performing their gymnastic and other feats at the Colosseum, a year or two ago.
She had the most powerful voice I ever heard in a woman. She had all the
appearance of being a great patron of malt liquor. If one were acquainted with
her domestic history, I have no doubt it would be found that she is one of the
most extensive consumers to be met with, of Whitbread and Co.’s Entire. She
was a woman of great size, and appeared to have the strength of a Hercules. how-
she was able to vociferate so constantly, was to inc a matter of surprise. Had a
woman of ordinary lungs, and the average physical strength, bawled for one
quarter of an hour, instead of a whole day, at the rate she did, such woman
would have made herself hoarse, and become utterly exhausted by the effort: but
all her exertions seemed to produce no impression on our heroine. Her face,
which was as round and red as a full-moon when she first presents herself above
the horizon, afforded no indications of weariness; nor did her voice show the
least symptom of exhaustion, if sufficiently plied with porter, I have no doubt
she could have held on for twenty, instead of for tent consecutive hours. What
amused me much, was the singular dexterity with which she introduced, as if by
way of parenthesis, into her commendation of her nuts, any observation which
circumstances rendered necessary; but never for a moment losing sight of the
main object, namely, the disposing of her half-round, half-oval commodities. If
a boy, for example, picked up a nut on the sly, either when falling from the
half-pint jug while transferring “a penny’orth” to some customer who had
been overcome by the charms of her eloquence, or when one had crossed the edge
of the canvass on which the stock lay, she would reprove him for his crime
without for a moment losing sight of her main object. “Here they are fresh
(you little rascal, return that nut, or I’ll break your bones) good full sweet
a penny (and you too, [-299-] you vagabond, just put it back into the heap) a half-pint
from the bag this (stand back there you girl with the red head and dirty face)
morning best sort not a bad ‘un among the lot.” The only fault to be found
with the matron s praises of her nuts, was a want of variety in her words: the
above was the only prose eulogium she pronounced upon them. She bad another,
which was in poetry. When she fixed her eye on some particular person among the
crowd who surrounded her commodities, she snatched up a nut, and thrusting it
into the hand of the intended victim to the tune of a “penny’orth,”
exclaimed,
“Here, take a nut, and break ‘em,
And if you find a bad ‘un, don’t take ‘em.”
And great was the amount of business which our retailer of
nuts did in tine course of a day. As she could not conveniently fill and empty
the half-pint jug, and attend to her vociferating duties at the same time, she
bad a boy, very possibly her son, who acted in the capacity of assistant: he
executed the orders, but all the money was paid to her. It was not the least
amusing part of the affair, to hear her lisping out the praises of her articles
with a sixpence or shilling in her mouth, while counting the “change” of
those who tendered her silver in payment of their penny’orths. There were
numerous other nut-venders in the Park; but little, comparatively was the extent
of the business which they did. I am serious, when I say, that I do believe she
drew more money for her nuts than any half-dozen of persons in the same line of
business. It is due to their sagacity to state, that all of them stationed
themselves at a respectful distance from the locality which she chose as the
scene of her merchandise. They knew that if near her they would have had no
chance.
Proceeding up the hill, so great a favourite with lovers, I
found it crowded in every part with young people, amusing themselves with the
popular exercise of trying how fast they could run down without losing their
equilibrium. Many of them—even persons of both sexes, who had got out of their
teens some years ago—received some awkward tumbles. I was only surprised that
the tragical termination which characterised the ascent of “Jack and Gill”,
of nursery celebrity, up some activity with whose geographical position I am
unacquainted, was not literally realized. To me it was, to speak quite soberly,
a matter of wonder that, like poor unfortunate Jack, no one “broke his neck”
when he “fell down.” Had such a disaster occurred, one could not have
regretted it so much as one does its occurrence in the case of little
“Jack,” the nursery hero. Poor dear boy, he ascended the bill for a most
praiseworthy object, namely, “To fetch a pail of water [-300-] and it was while so laudably employed that the awful
catastrophe of breaking his neck occurred; but the parties who “went up”
Greenwich hill, did so for the purpose of foolishly running down again. If,
therefore, any fatal accident had been the result of their folly, less sorrow
would have been felt than in other circumstances. It happened, however, that no
necks were broken on the occasion. The disaster of greatest magnitude which
occurred under my observation, took place in the case of a genteel good-looking
girl, seemingly a servant, about twenty years of age. She fell with tremendous
force on her face, and what “the fancy” call the claret, suddenly gushed
from a prominent part of her phiz. If anything could have made the disaster
worse, it would have been the inexpressibly droll observation which a youth,
about fourteen or fifteen years of age, made, on being asked by a person who was
passing, “what was the matter with the young woman, that so many persons were
standing around her, and she was holding her pocket-handkerchief to her face!”
“Oh, nothing!” said the young rascal, with the most perfect nonchalance; she
was only having a game at running down the hill, when she lost her balance, and
trode upon her nose: that’s all.” The idea of treading on one’s nose
struck me as irresistibly droll.
On the top of the hill a very animated scene was exhibited,
in the shape of a keenly-contested battle. The belligerents were, for the most
part, young men, fifty or sixty on either side; and what does the reader suppose
were the weapons of their warfare! Their fists? No.—Sticks? No.—Stones?
No.—What then? Why nothing else than that description of apples called
pippins! With these they pelted one another most cordially, and many were the
severe hits which were received on both sides. The chief source of regret was,
that those who were no parties to the fight, but were walking quite pacifically
disposed along the summit of the hill, occasionally came in for their share of
the “hits,” as they were called, which were so liberally given and received
by the opposing parties. I recollect, when a boy, reading a private letter from
a relative, in which an account was given by one who took a part in it, of an
important action between the English and French armies; and after detailing, in
graphic terms, the numbers he saw momentarily falling around him on the field of
battle, and the circumstances under which some of his comrades were killed, lie
added—as well as I can remember the words: “but sad and sorrowful as I was,
at seeing so many men—many of them my acquaintances, in the enjoyment of
perfect health, and in the prime of life—dropping down, and expiring around
me, I felt far more deeply affected at the fate of a poor rifleman who, after
being wounded, had managed to crawl [-301-] from the scene of action, but was shot by a
Frenchman just at the moment when, in all probability, he thought he had escaped
all further danger.” In like manner, numerous as were the militants whom I had
seen wounded, and some of them very painfully so, in this battle on the top of
Greenwich hill, I did not feel for them a fraction of the concern which I felt
for a young inoffensive girl who, though she kept at a reasonable distance from
the scene of action, had a large breach made in her Leghorn bonnet—to say
nothing of a very unpleasant “whack” on the head—by means of an apple.
Whether this was the result of design, or of accident, I cannot say: I should
hope, for the credit of human nature, that the thing was purely accidental. I am
willing to believe, that depraved and ignoble as many of the frequenters of
metropolitan and suburban fairs are, there are few of them so utterly lost to
all sense of the claims which the sex have on protection at our hands, as to be
capable of perpetrating so daring an outrage as aiming a hard apple at a
female’s head.
Not knowing whose cranium might receive the next apple, I
lost no time in quitting the scene of conflict, and advanced to the Heath. And
what a scene did I witness there! There were, at least, from fifty to sixty
four-footed asses on the roadside: how many asses of another kind there were
present, is one of those difficult problems which it is beyond my power to
solve. In point of numbers, I shrewdly suspect the biped animals, with long
ears, were larger than that of the four-footed quadrupeds that were so
tastefully put into classes along the aide of the road. The asses on all-fours
were placed there for the purpose of asses, who walk in another form, riding
about the Heath on their backs. Each had a saddle, such as it was, covered over
with a ragged piece of cloth, which, in most cases, had, in its better days,
answered the purposes of a smock-frock, or been dignified with the name of a
shirt. I pitied the poor animals, while I felt indignation and contempt towards
those— and sorry am I to say, the eases were not few—who could severely lash
and otherwise cruelly treat them. Persons of both sexes, and-of advanced years,
largely patronised the proprietors of the donkeys, by hiring the latter out to
ride. Had they contented themselves with sitting on the backs of the poor
beasts, I should have been silent; but, not satisfied with that, they must needs
lash and strike the unoffending creatures with great severity, under the pretext
of causing them to move at a more rapid pace. There were, I understand, several
of the officers of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals present;
but there was either not a sufficient number, or they were remiss in the
performance of their duties. Not to mention other instances of [-302-] cruelty which
occurred under my own eye, there was one of a most flagrant nature. Two young
ruffians, about fourteen or fifteen years of age, followed one poor miserable
donkey, on whose back a clumsy grown-up fellow, of great specific gravity, sate.
It would, positively, have been, in the language of certain philosophers, more
in accordance with “the fitness of things,” had this lumbering athletic
fellow carried the feeble worn-out donkey, instead of the ass carrying him. As
the poor creature was unable to do more than move at a slow pace with the two-.
legged animal on its back, each of the young barbarians already alluded to
applied a large stick to its sides with all their force, with the view of
goading it on to greater speed.
But for the cruelties practised towards the helpless
jack-asses, one could have heartily laughed at the odd exhibitions made by many
of the equestrians. Kitchen-maids, cookeys, and various other riders, of both
sexes, had never been on the back of any four-footed beast before. The females
screamed and clung to the saddle as if it had been an affair of life or death,
if the donkeys happened to trot for a pace or two; and not a few of them fell
altogether, to the manifest gratification of the long-eared quadrupeds which had
been burdened with them but a moment before.
I was much amused with a cockney youth, seemingly about
twenty years of age, of very affected manners, who was ambitious of exhibiting
his person on the back of a donkey. Advancing towards one of the stands, on
which there stood fifteen or twenty of these animals, with their proprietors all
anxious to be employed, he accosted the latter in what is called a puppyish air
and manner, with “Well, old fellows, who has got the best donkey for a
ride?”
“Here you are, Sir,” shouted a dozen voices, each
donkey proprietor drawing his animal towards the cockney.
“I can’t ride on all of them; which is the best?”
said the dandy, resting his hands on his sides, and strutting about with an air
of great consequence.
“This von’s the best, Sir,” cried one.
“No, it ain’t,” vociferated another. “This ‘ere
hanimal is betterer nor any won on the stand.”
“Both on ‘em’s told you a gallows lie, Sir; none of
their hasses can lift a leg; but here’s a beast of the right sort,” said a
third.
“Here’s a capital good ‘un, Sir; three years old next
grass-time, Sir,” was the recommendation of his donkey, which was given by a
fourth.
“My von’s the best as vas ever seed, Sir; yen he’s
once a-set a-going, he’ll never stop, Sir. It’s truth I say, Sir,”
remarked a fifth.
[-303-] “Then,” said the cockney, “I’ll take him.”
“Yes, Sir,” observed another opposition proprietor of a
couple of donkeys; “but there’s no setting him a-going. Nobody ever saw him
trot a step.”
“Here’s a reg’lar trump of an hanimal, Sir,” said
another; “you’ve only to touch him this way, and off he gallops at once.”
As the donkey proprietor spoke, he pretended to touch the
ass’s side with his fingers, and, sure enough, the animal made two or three
abortive attempts at a leap.
“Ay, there’s some spirit in that donkey,” said the
cockney youth, not aware that the cunning rogue of a proprietor had achieved the
two or three bungled leaps which the animal gave, by pricking it with a pin.
“What is the charge?”
“It depends on how far you ride, Sir.” “From one end
of the heath to the other?” “Only a shilling Sir.”
“Then, here goes.”
And so saying, the cockney was astride the ass’s back in
a twinkling.
“The shilling, Sir, if you please,” said the proprietor
of the anima1, with a knowing look.
““Why, isn’t it time enough when I have had my
ride?” said the dandy, pulling a shilling out of his pocket, and transferring
it to the other.
“Always in advance, Sir,” answered the ass-proprietor,
archly, pocketing the silver image of William the Fourth.
“Now then,” said the cockney, applying a switch to the
sides of the donkey, and looking as if he supposed he was about to start off at
the rate of fifteen miles an hour. “Now then.”
The animal either did not hear, or did not heed, the “Now
then” of the cockney. “Why, he woan’t go,” said the latter, in a tone of
voice, and with a look at the proprietor of the beast, indicative of surprise
and disappointment
“He will, by-and-bye” said the other, coolly.
“But I want him to go now.”
“Werry good, Sir; as soon as you and the hanimal
pleases.”
The dandy-rider was confounded at the consummate
nonchalance of the person whose ass he was patronising. “I say, old fellow, I
won’t stand any nonsense and pay for it too. Either make your ass go, or give
me back my shilling,” remarked the cockney youth, in half-indignant tones.
“We never gives back any shiners, Sir, arter we’ve got
‘em,” answered the other, with the same dryness of manner as before.
“Then, Sir, make your beast go. “That’s more than I
can always do, Sir; he’s a little hobstinate at times, as all hasses are; but
when once he sets off, there’s ne’er a better runner on the Heath.”
[-304-] “Yez, Zur,” interposed a clownish-looking fellow, with
a smock-frock and a dirty demure-looking face; “but the worst of it is, he
never sets off at all.”
I had a shrewd suspicion that such was the fact, before the
latter personage made the observation; and after two or three more equally
ineffectual attempts to cause the animal to start, the dandy rider became a
proselyte to the same opinion.
Finding he might as soon have expected to move Greenwich
church, as to move the animal on whose back lie sat, he dismounted, muttering
imprecations of no very pleasant kind, both on the ass and its owner. His
imprecations were equally disregarded by both.
“Try this one, Sir;” “Here’s a prime ‘un, Sir
;“ “No mistake with this ‘ere hanimal, Sir;” “Here’s the reg’lar
racer, Sir;” were only a few of the many sounds which greeted his ears as he
alighted. In short, in a few seconds, he was surrounded by a congregation, to
the number of twenty or two dozen, of jack-asses and their owners; the latter of
whom respectively besieged him with their applications to try their
“hanimals,” with a vehemence and perseverance amounting to positive
persecution. At first, savage and surly at the “hobstinacy” of the beast he
had but a few moments ago bestrode, he refused to listen to any of their
solicitations; but one of the ass-owners was so very eloquent in his entreaties
for a trial of his donkey, that the cockney at length acceded to his request ;
stipulating, however, beforehand, that he would not pay his shilling until
satisfied of the racing capabilities and disposition of the animal. He mounted
the beast, and the owner, a young knowing-looking fellow, immediately pricked it
with a pin, when It set off at a smart trot. “Ah, I told you that’s your
sort, Sir; that’s the hanimal as can run in slap-up style,” said the
proprietor of the beast, keeping up with it, and prompting it forward by
repeated applications of the pin to its side. “Ay, this is some-thing like an
ass,” said the cockney. “Here, take your shilling,” he added, pulling up
the donkey for a moment, and putting that amount of the coin of the realm into
the hand of the cunning rogue. “Now then, long-ears,” said the dandy,
apostrophising the donkey, and applying the switch to it, with the view of
setting out on a regular gallop along the road.
The animal moved not a step.
“Halloa, old donkey! what’s the matter that you
woan’t go ?“ said the spruce rider, applying his heels to the sides of the
animal.
The latter was appealed to in vain. There it stood as
motionless as the bronze horse with the statue of George the Third on his back,
near the Italian Opera House.
[-305-] “I say, old fellow,” said the cockney, now transferring
his appeal from the ass to its owner; “I say, old fellow, why doan’t the
animal go?”
“Can’t tell, Sir; he knows the reason best himself,”
answered the other, with inimitable coolness.
“Is there no way of making him go ?”
“He won’t be made, Sir; he never does anything by
force. If you wait until he comes to himself, he’ll start off agin.”
“But when will that be ?”
“Aye, that’s more than I can tell; but not before he
pleases.”
The cockney looked first at the donkey, and then at its
owner, as if he could have eaten both by way of revenging himself for the
obstinacy and laziness of the one, and the consummate coolness of the other. he
then suddenly dismounted, heaping curses both loud and deep on asses of all
descriptions; not excepting himself, for being such an ass as to be thus taken
in, and laughed at into the bargain, by the donkey owners of Blackheath.
A Greenwich Fair, without a greater or less number of
fights, would be a modern miracle. How many-took place during the fair in
question, is a point with the statistics of which I am unacquainted. I witnessed
one which threatened, at one time, to be productive of no inconsiderable number
of broken heads, if not of personal damage of an irretrievable nature. In this
fight, to which there were several parties, both soldiers and sailors, true to
their proverbial character, took a marked part. “Drunk as usual,” one
soldier. displayed a wonderful ingenuity, both by his words and actions, in
inviting aggression; and he soon got it to his heart’s content. “He met with
his marrow,” as the phrase is, in the person of an athletic Irishman newly
arrived from the neighbourhood of Derrynane Abbey. “By the great Dan
himself,” said Pat, “if it’s a fight he’s after wanting, its meself will
give him that same.” “Come on, then,” mumbled the soldier, staggering
slightly from the effects of drink. “May be I won’t,” said Paddy,
advancing as he spoke, and planting some heavy blows in the face of his
red-coated opponent, which made him reel yet worse than the liquor. A regular
fight ensued, in which sailors and soldier and other persons took part with a
marvellous promptitude, until it became quite a general affair. The police
interfered; and when they had put a stop to the combat, the soldier, who was
instrumental in beginning it, was found lying on the ground, “floored,” as
the Fancy say, either by his Irish antagonist or by his no less formidable,
because more frequent and insidious adversary, Barclay and Co.’s porter. He
was carried away on the stretcher to the station-house, where he lay as straight
as a pole and as silent as a bell without [-306-] a tongue; though a few minutes before,
he was all noise and bluster and “botheration.”
I refer to the fights which are so common at all our
metropolitan fairs, chiefly for the purpose of expressing my surprise and regret
that so many persons, with a good coat on their backs and intelligence in their
countenances, should not. only stand by, without endeavouring to put an end to
such brutal and barbarous exhibitions, but should encourage the parties in their
disgraceful practices.
The fight or affray which I witnessed, occurred in the
park; from which 1 proceeded to the heart of the fair. There were congregated in
the narrow limits of, perhaps, one hundred and fifty yards long, by six or seven
yards broad, a mass of human beings, numbering, I should think, not less than
30,000. They were so densely packed together, that it was quite a Herculean task
to force one’s way through them. On either side of the market-place were
stalls and caravans, and other things, to which I know not what name to give, of
all sizes and descriptions. I hold it impossible that any human being, be his
imagination as fertile as it may, could previously have formed any idea of the
vast variety of expedients which were resorted to at this fair, with the view of
eliciting money from the pockets of the visitors. Of eatables, of all
descriptions, there was a most abundant supply: apples, oranges, and nuts,
stared you in the face in every direction; while gingerbread was presented in an
inconceivable diversity of forms. Nor was there any lack of liquids:
there was an ample supply of chalk-and-water, which, for
the purposes of sale, was baptised milk; there were little cans of table-beer,
and ginger-beer, and soda-water; but the speculators in these liquids found,
before the fair was over, that they had reckoned without their host. The
weather, as before stated, was intensely cold, which is always fatal to the sale
of beer of all kinds, especially in the open air; and which is still more fatal
to the sale of ginger-beer and soda-water. Loud were the luckless proprietors of
these liquids in their praises of the quality of the article they were anxious
to vend; but all the eloquence and ingenuity in the world would not have insured
a demand in this case. In fact, the shivering persons who stood in the
marketplace, would not have drunk either soda-water or -ginger-beer on this
occasion, had they been paid for doing it. Ardent spirits were the order of the
day, and the order of the hour and nunute also, during the three days the fair
lasted. “Summut to warm us,” was the universal motto of the parties; and the
effects of the quantity of these spirits quaffed on the occasion were visible in
the scenes of drunkenness and disturbance which presented themselves wherever
you turned your eye.
[-307-] Of showy articles, or things which were merely intended to
please the eye, there was also a most liberal supply. The assortment of dolls
was varied and abundant. it struck me, indeed, as a sort of libel on the
frequenters of the fair, that so many dolls should be exposed for sale; for if
there be meaning in facts, as there is iii 1angU~ge, the circumstance plainly
implied that the dealers in them assumed that the young men and women who
attended the fair were but so many children, though children of a larger growth.
My only surprise was, that they did not resent the thing as a personal insult,
when accosted, as they were at every step they took, with— “Buy a doll, Sir,” “Buy a doll, Ma’am” the article which they
were invited to purchase being at the same time thrust in their faces. Crackers,
scratchers, little drums, sixpenny looking-glasses, watches which never went and
never were meant to go, being, like the razors which Peter Pindar has
immortalized as made not to shave but to sell; and innumerable other articles
which, to use a favourite expression of George Robins, were too tedious to
mention, were all exposed to the eye, under the most attractive possible
circumstances. “There was,” as an Irish girl emphatically exclaimed in
describing the scene to an acquaintance she met outside the market-place,
“such a power of fine things!”
In the article of “sights,” again, Greenwich Fair was,
if that were possible, still more amply supplied. You would have fancied, from
the number of caravans, booths, and other places for the exhibition of wonders
of all kinds, artificial and natural, that the marvels of the whole world had
been congregated within the limited space appropriated to Greenwich Fair. The
seven wonders of the world, is a phrase which became familiar to us in our
younger years perhaps it is one of the first phrases we remember to have been
current in the days of our childhood. Here we had, instead of seven, at least a
hundred wonders of the world. And what was worthy of observation was, that every
individual wonder was more wonderful that is to say, if you took the
proprietor’s word for it—than any other wonder. The great difficulty with
those who had but little copper in their pockets though, peradventure,
abundantly supplied with another well-known metal in their faces; the great
difficulty with them was to make a selection. The figures which were daubed on
the canvas which was displayed at the front of the caravans and other wooden
erections, were most inviting; indeed, as is usually the ease, the
representations far surpassed the things represented. But in addition to the
attack they made on your curiosity and your pockets, through the medium of your
eyes, there were dead sets made at you through the medium of your ears. Nothing
could exceed the earnestness or the eloquence with which the [-308-] various proprietors
of the exhibitions praised the articles exhibited. There was “the Lincolnshire
Ox, the most biggest hanimal of the kind as was ever seen, and whose tail alone
was not quite so thick as the mast of a man-of-war.” My astonishment was, how
such a “prodigiously-sized” beast could have been got into a sort of caravan
of such limited dimensions, that I should have fancied a cow of the ordinary
stature would not have had turning room in it. Whether the proprietor of this
gigantic Lincolnshire ox was a disciple of Procrustes, and made the ox to fit
the place, if the place did not fit him, is a problem which I was prevented from
solving, as circumstances interposed to deny me the gratification of seeing the
“wonderful hanimal.” The next-door neighbour of the “most biggest ox as
was ever seen,” but belonging to a different owner, was “the most
extraordinary sheep with four legs and the half of a fifth ‘un.” The patrons
of the fair were pressingly invited to “walk up, and see with their own eyes
this truly vonderful production of the vorks of natur.” I was sorry to see
that the proprietor’s emphatic am repeated appeals were, in a great measure,
lost on the dense crowd to whom they were addressed. They proved that they had
no relish for “sheep with four legs and the half of a fifth un.” Adjoining
the last “vonderful production,” there was a “vonderful pig ;“ not the
old pig of literary reputation, nor the Learned Pig, as the swinish scholar and
philosopher was usually called. No: this was a pig, whose wonderful qualities
were of a physical, instead of an intellectual nature. “It was a pig as was so
fat as never to rise off the place vere she lay, and as could not stand upon her
legs yen she was fairly put on ‘em.” Judging from the portrait, if there be
propriety in the expression, of this “wery extrahordinary hanimal,” which
appeared as large as life on the canvas that graced the front of the place of
exhibition, I should certainly say that her pigship must have been among the
“swinish multitude,” what the celebrated Daniel Lambert was among animals of
the biped class. Her belly not only trailed on the ground, but, if the
representation was a correct one, her excessive corpulence had given her a
globular appearance. I thought with myself, what a treat must her pigship be to
the lovers of fat pork, when she falls into the hands of the butcher. A few
yards from the spot in which the fat pig starred it, there was a collection of
animals forming a sort of miniature menagerie. The figures on the canvas outside
were newly painted, and were unusually inviting to go inside. But lest the
representations outside were not of themselves sufficiently powerful motives to
induce the spectators to go in, to these were superadded the motive., which
could not fail to arise from the singularly winning way in which the owner of
the animals im-[-309-]plored them to inspect the beasts. “Ladies and gen’lemen, if
the hanimals within here be not a treat to any one as sees ‘em, then I pledge
myself to eat up every beast in the caravan alive, the tiger and all. But,
ladies and gen’lemen, I’m quite certain of it, that you will all be
vonderfully pleased. Those who are not satisfied with this extrahordinary
sight—the like of which was never seen before, and never will be agin may have
their ‘tin back again; and so they will have the splendidest sight as is in
London for nothing. And, ladies and gen’lemen I am sure you all knows that it
cannot be less. Do walk up this way if you please; walk up this way. All the
hanimals to be seen for small charge of threepence.” Of the giant Rockman, and
the dwarf Jarmain, each of whom had his place to himself, and to whom the
payment of a penny always proved a passport; of them I say nothing. They were
confessedly extraordinary enough in their respective
lines; but I pass them by, for the purpose of saying, that the most wonderful
live exhibition in the fair was, if the owner might be credited, that of some
extraordinary unheard-of animal which walked partly on his legs and partly in an
all-four’s form, and which moved like an extraordinary quadruped mentioned in
Captain Marryat’s “Peter Simple,” as having been exhibited at Bartholomew
Fair, which measured fifteen feet from the tail to the head, and thirteen feet
and a half from the head to the tail! But there would be no end to
particularizing the live stock exhibited on this occasion. Every showman had, if
you were good-natured enough to take his own word for it, something “far more
better” than any of his neighbours; and he was greatly surprised, as well as
indignant, at the perversion of public taste, when he saw other exhibitions
patronised while his was deserted.
With menageries, on a small scale, Greenwich Fair was most liberally supplied;
and if the assertions of the parties who invited the curious in such matters to
come and inspect them, might be believed, there were in all those menageries
“lots of hanimals of a most extrahordinary kind.”
In the theatrical way there was a good deal of business
done. I should think the number of portable theatres, of one kind or other,
could not have been much under a dozen; and so great was the taste for the
drama, that theatrical speculations answered much better than any other kind of
speculations. “The successor on the boards” of the late eccentric
Richardson, appeared to be by far the most extensively patronised. The Clown
was, as usual, the great attraction. The spectators stared and laughed, and
laughed and stared again, at his ludicrous evolutions. Some of the audience,
including chimney-sweeps, tap-room boys, and others, to whom the Clown’s
movements were perfect novelties in their way, turned up the white of their eyes
in the plenitude [-310-] of their amazement at the wonders he performed; and most
unequivocal were the marks, in so far as a vehement clapping of hands and loud
laughter were concerned, of the approbation with which they greeted his
exploits. If any one wished to see the legitimate drama burlesqued with the
greatest possible effect, he ought by all means to make part of the audience in
one of the portable theatres at Greenwich Fair. The price of admission is
reasonable enough: a fourteenth part of what it costs at Drury Lane or Covent
Garden will procure him a place either in the pit or gallery. In other words,
one’s dramatic taste may be indulged in the theatrical establishments at
Greenwich Fair, on the payment of sixpence for the pit, or threepence for the
gallery. And who will say that the charge is extravagant? Boxes, there are none;
and even the order of things, as regards the pit and gallery, are reversed: for
the gallery—at least, in those establishments I have been in—is on the
ground-floor, while the pit is six or seven feet above the gallery. However,
such things will happen; or, as the proprietors themselves say, there is no use
in being too particular. The character of the pieces per-formed, and the quality
of acting, are precisely such as I so fully described in my chapter on “Penny
Theatres;” and therefore it is not necessary to repeat the description here.
Any actor is at liberty, in an emergency, to say what he pleases, or to act as
he thinks fit. All that is stipulated for on the part of the proprietors, is,
that something be said, and that something be done.
If Drury Lane and Covent Garden have their rivals in
Greenwich Fair, so has Astley’s. Not only are there equestrian performances
“which has never been ekvalled in this ‘ere vorld before,” but there “is
the truly vonderful feats on the tight rope, and various hother exhibishuns too
tedious to mention, all performed in the best style.” I went into one of these
rivals of Astley’s Amphitheatre, to witness some of these “unekvalled” and
“truly vonderful’ “various hother exhibishuns;” but must candidly
confess, that such was the worthless quality of my taste in such matters, that I
was much more gratified with the ludicrous conduct and humorous remarks of some
of the audience. Some of my readers may remember to have heard of a cunning
rogue of a traveller who, on going to an inn, in a small town, on an intensely
cold evening, found that there was only one fire, namely, the kitchen fire,
burning at the time; and it was completely concealed from his view by a number
of the neighbours who were earnestly engaged in conversation together. Not one
of them moved a stool or chair to allow the stranger to partake of the genial
warmth, and he had no hope of succeeding by an appeal either to their politeness
or humanity. At last, he resolved [-311-] on trying the effect of an ingenious expedient
in his endeavours to procure a place beside the grateful hearth. “Ostler,”
he exclaimed.
“Coming, Sir.”
“Are there any oysters to be had here ?”
“As many as you please, Sir; great place this for
oysters, Sir.”
“Very good. Well, then, you go and give half a peck of
the very best you’ve got to my horse in the stable.”
“Your ‘oss, Sir ?“ said the ostler, looking
unutterably amazed. “Yes, my horse,” said the stranger, quite coolly.
“Bless your soul, Sir, ‘osses don’t eat oysters! I
never heard of such a thing. You must be mistaken, Sir,” suggested the ostler,
with an air of respect.
“Oh no; no mistake—no mistake; you bring the oysters
directly to the horse.”
The other scratched his head, and mumbled out, “Yes, Sir,
presently.”
“As quick as you can, ‘said the traveller.
“This moment, Sir,” said the ostler, darting out of the
kitchen, to provide the horse with his supper of oysters. A general rush of
those who were at the fire followed, every one being more anxious than, another
to see how the horse would eat shell-fish; so that the stranger had the entire
kitchen, fire and all, to himself. He took the best chair he could find, and
seating himself at the fire, determined on making himself quite at home. In a
minute or so, the ostler, accompanied by all his followers, returned to the
kitchen, saying— “It’s jost as I said: the ‘oss von’t eat ne’er a
one on ‘em, Sir.”
“Then bring them to me,” said the stranger, “and
I’ll eat them myself.”
I was reminded of this ingenious expedient to secure a
comfortable seat at the fire, when nothing but some such expedient could have
succeeded, by the device to which a person resorted, to get a good place at the
rival Astley’s at Greenwich Fair. He had been among the latest to enter, and
all the good places were pre-occupied. Incomparably the best place, at the
threepenny rate of admission, was on a sort of wooden stair, by means of which
the descent to, and the ascent from, the gallery was to be achieved. The top of
this stair was on a level with the pit; but it was densely peopled, or, as the
play-bills say, “crowded in every part.” “Is there no room here?”
inquired a cunning-looking countryman, as he entered the place.
No one made him any answer.
“Do, frien’s, try to make room for a poor fellaw,”
said the clodpole-looking personage, whose accent proved to demonstration that
Yorkshire claimed him as her own.
[-312-] The appeal was ineffectual: the portion of the threepennv
audience, who had planted themselves in that particular locality, only stood
more closely together.
“Well, coom, I’m cu’st, if ye bean’t an uncivil set
of people,” I said the Yorkshireman, after a momentary pause.
Censure seemed to have as little effect on them as an
appeal to their politeness; for no one moved an inch to accommodate the
new-corner. He paused a few seconds again, when an idea I flashed across his
mind. He quietly went out of the place, and let fall a green cloth curtain,
which answered the purposes of a door, behind him. In a few seconds afterwards,
he put the
curtain partially aside, and thrusting in his head, bawled
out in stentorian tones—Halloa! clear the stair there; mind your r eyes; here
comes a horse.” Not recognising the Yorkshireman
in the abrupt and unexpected apostrophe, and supposing that
one of the horses about to ride in the ring was really coming down the stair, there was an instantaneous and unusual rush into the gallery. In two or three seconds, the stair was completely I cleared, and
the Yorkshireman promptly took possession of the best part of it.
The humorous remarks made by the audience, while the
performances were proceeding, often caused bursts of laughter. In this. respect,
indeed, the “Merriman” found that he had a number of formidable rivals. A
young woman, of a copper complexion, who monopolized the performances on the
tight-rope, said, in a very affected “fine lady” sort of air, addressing
herself to the Clown—” Chalk my feet, Sir.” “Vouldn’t your face, too,
be all the better of a little on’t, Ma’am?”
observed a rustic-looking young man among the audience, with a dryness of manner
which told with much effect. “I say, Miss,” exclaimed I another voice, “Vy
do you always dance the same thing ? Vy don’t you give us ‘Jack in the Green
‘~‘ Or “Vy don’t you jump ‘Jim Crow’ young vornan?” said a third.
“You hold your tongue, Sir,” rejoined the Clown, authoritatively, looking in
the direction of the place whence the last voice proceeded. He had scarcely
uttered the words, when a small apple abruptly alighted on the crown of his
head, which was graced
with a nightcap of many colours. Putting his hand to the
part of his head which was hit, he looked half-piteously and half-indignantly
around the audience. “Who did that?” he inquired. “Nobody,” answered a voice, after a momentary pause.
“It I was an anonymous blow,” said another, amidst bursts of laughter from
all parts of the house, which so disconcerted and annoyed poor “Mr.
Merriman,” that he was not able either to make a passable new joke the whole
evening afterwards, or to retail his old ones with the slightest spirit.
[-313-] It appeared to me, that the scene on the sort of hustings
outside the theatres at Greenwich Fair, was better worth seeing than the
performances within. There the female actresses, if they should be dignified
with the name, strutted about in a mock majesty which, in their circumstances,
was truly ridiculous. They were decked out in all manner of tawdry trumpery:
they had feathers in their heads; but they were such feathers as I had never
seen before. Their dresses, which, I regret to say, I am incompetent to
describe, were thickly studded with small fragments of- some sort of metal,
which, though seemingly opaque enough in ordinary circumstances, did “cast
reflections” when in contiguity to the blazing lights at the front of the
theatre. Nothing could be more amusing than the would-be dignified step and
consequential air with which these female supporters of the drama walked about
before the assembled thousands; many of whom were, no doubt, both wondering and
admiring spectators. Had these actresses been so many princesses, they could not
have assumed greater importance, or appeared more stiff and stately in their
carriage. I thought, as I saw them, of the females who grace the train of
Jack-in-the-Green, on May-day. I thought of poor Black Moll, who is doomed to
dangle, dressed in white, above-the doors of marine-store dealers, from one end
of the year to the other. And yet, if these histrionic personages were happy,
in, the thought of their fancied superiority to all other females, why should
anyone seek to undeceive them? It was edifying to witness the different objects
which the, parties in the front of the theatre had in view. The girls in
question thought of nothing but themselves: they sought to show themselves off.
The proprietor; on the other hand, had nothing in his head but how he could.
best induce persons to patronize. his performances. His wife was wholly intent
on taking money, and giving cheeks in return; while a poor fellow most assiduously played the Clown outside, in the character of
“Spring-heeled Jack,” because he saw that his own interests were bound up
with those of his master.
Gambling was carried on in Greenwich Fair to a very great
extent, and in every variety of form. There were roulette, hazard, and other
games, at which persons might play for stakes of from one shilling upwards to a
sovereign; and many were the simpletons these notable hell-keepers victimised on
the occasion. This class of gamblers took care to carry on their business in
places not exposed to the general gaze. There was, however, no lack of gamblers
on a smaller scale, whose operations were performed in the light of day, and in
the most densely crowded parts of the market. There were wheel-of-fortune men;
and most promptly did these machines and their proprietors fleece [-314-] the simple,
soft-looking lads who ventured their pence on particular articles. In order to
decoy and deceive the unsuspecting cockneys, or gullible youths belonging to
Greenwich or its neighbourhood, they took care to keep the wheel in constant
motion. For this purpose, they had severally one or two cunning young rascals in
their employ, who, while they saw others losing their money, contented
themselves with merely looking on and encouraging greenhorns to “try again,”
on an assurance that they were certain of gaining next time. They appeared all
the while not only to have no connection with the professed gamblers, but not
even to know them. The moment others ceased to turn round the wheel, they put
down their halfpence; and when trying for two or three articles unsuccessfully
several times, the sly rogues would, in a careless sort of tone, as if the
result of the purest accident, make the observation—” Oh, never mind; can
afford to lose a few browns this time; gained half-a-crown’s worth of things
with three hap’nies, a short time ago.” This most probably has the effect of
inducing some simpleton to try his luck, thinking in his own mind that there can
be no good reason why he should not gain a half-crown’s worth of things for
his three hap’nies as well as others. He begins, and that moment the other
ceases to turn round the wheel; the three hap’nies are gone, but bring no
half-crown; no, not even one penny s worth of the trinkets so invitingly spread
out before him. He tries other three; they follow their predecessors: three
more; they are not a whit more lucky. His losses reach a shilling; he goes on,
provided he has the money, until, possibly, he loses half-a-crown. Even if he
does happen to gain some article which he fancied was worth eighteen-pence, he
finds, on inspection, that it is not worth twopence; so that he is cheated under
any circumstances.
The thimble-riggers mustered strong, and appeared to drive
a profitable business. They were to be found in all the leading openings to the
Fair. Much as every man of healthy moral feeling must disapprove of
thimble-rigging, there was no resisting an occasional hearty laugh at the
awkward circumstances under which some of the victims betrayed their simplicity.
“Who lifts the thimble that kivers the pea next time?” was the everlasting
question of the proprietor of the pea, the three thimbles, and the half-crown
table, on which the gambling took place,—whenever there was a pause in the
play; and as he spoke, he shifted about the thimbles with an almost
sleight-of-hand celerity. “I knows the one it’s under,” whispers a
greenhorn to some acquaintance.
“Are you quite sure?”
“Quite sure; could swear I knows it, and no mistake.
[-315-] “Then what a tool you are, not to put down your
shiners.”
Thus appealed to, down goes the crown, half-crown, or
shilling, as the case may be, and the simpleton lifts the thimble. Imagine his
surprise, his confusion, and mortification, when he raises it and finds that
neither pea nor anything else is there. He can scarcely credit the evidence of
his eyes. He would, indeed, live and die in the belief that it had miraculously
vanished, did not the proprietor lift another thimble, and exhibit the pea to
the gaze of all present.
“It’s all the fortune of war,’ says the
thimble-rigger, moving about his thimbles. “Who tries his luck next? Can’t
always gain.”
A person who is supposed, by those unacquainted with the
roguery of these fellows, to have no connexion with or knowledge of them, but is
one of themselves, now advances, and learning from some secret signs made by the
mover of the thimbles, the one under which the pea lies, says, “I lay five
shillings I know the thimble which kivers the pea.”
“Here you are, Sir,” says the other, putting down his
five shillings.
The supposed stranger puts down his crown: he raises the
thimble, and the pea is there. lie is inwardly congratulated on his good luck by
the spectators around, they still imagining that he is as much a stranger to the
thimble-man as themselves.
“Never grumbles when I loses, though better pleased when
I wins. Who tries their luck next time?” says the thimble-rigger, shifting the
thimbles on the table so slowly that no one can fail to perceive under which one
the pea is. “I see the one,” says some greenhorn in audible tones.
“Which one is it!” inquires the party, in a whisper,
who bad tried it last time, and who, though one of the rogues who are robbing
simpletons is still imagined to be a perfect stranger.
“That one,” pointing to the thimble under which the pea
actually is.
“Five shillings again, that I unkiver the pea,” says
he, with some eagerness throwing down his crown.
“Done, Sir,” says the thimble~rigger, throwing his five
shillings on the table also.
The supposed adventurer raises the thimble, and, behold,
the pea is again there.
“You were quite right, Sir,” says he, in agreeable
accents, to the simpleton, at whose pockets a dead set is made
“Oh, I knew it,” says the latter, giving a
consequential nod of his head, by way of showing that he was perfectly aware of
his own superior imaginary discernment.
[-316-] “Just speak a moment,” whispers the coadjutor of the
thimble-rigger to the intended victim.
“Certainly,” says the latter; and both retire a few
steps together. “Why don’t you try for yourself, and fleece these
fellows?” says the supposed stranger.
“Woy, I doan’t know,” says the poor simpleton.
“Suppose we run halves, when we see a good chance?” observes the other.
“Well, I doan’t care, though I do,” answers the
greenhorn.
They return to the table: the thimble-rigger again shifts
the thimbles, and invites “any one” to try his luck.
“I doan’t know vich is the right ‘un this time,”
remarks the unsuspecting simpleton.
“Ah, but I do,” says the other, with a knowing nod of
the head. “That’s it,” pointing to a particular thimble.
“Then let us put down one half-crown each.”
“By all means,” says the other, throwing down his
half-crown.
The thimble-rigger puts down his crown, and the partner of
the poor greenhorn raises the thimble; but, lo! there is no pea there. He
affects to be marvellously surprised; the thing is beyond his comprehension;
however, he swears that he won’t be mistaken next time. Another venture is
made, but with no better success. There is no limit to his amazement; the thing
is altogether so unaccountable, that there must be some legerdemain in it. He
gives a still greater oath that he won’t be wrong next time: the victim
ventures once more, on the solemn assurance that his partner in the speculation
knows the right thimble this time. The latter lifts it, but still no pea is
there. He stamps with his feet, strikes his forehead with his hand, makes
extraordinary faces, swears so liberally both at the pea and himself, and
altogether acts his part so well, that, though the victim will not trust his
discernment any more, and consequently abstains from any more gambling, yet he
never once questions his honesty; to say nothing of his not even suspecting that
he is a partner in the robberies of the thimble-rigger. In this and various
other ways simple persons, whether from London or the surrounding country, are
sure to be fleeced, if they are foolish enough to play at the game of
thimble-rigging.
The proprietors of swings, at the last Greenwich Fair, must
have made a little fortune; for most liberally were their “machines,” as
they themselves call them, patronized. Not one, so long as I was there., was
idle for a moment. The poor fellows who had to keep them in motion had no
sinecure of it. Everybody else seemed half-perishing of cold; they were
perspiring with the warmth caused by their unremitting labours. It was curious
to see how differently the different persons who committed them-[-317-]selves to the
swing felt, when they were driven about in the air. Many of the females—and I
have always observed, though I cannot account for the circumstance, that the
women are the greatest patrons of swings - many of the females got up a few
screams in the plenitude of their affected alarm at being moved to and fro at so
rapid a rate in the air; some shrieked because they did actually feel
frightened, when suspended between earth and heaven, though they apprehended no
such fears before entering the car; while others laughed, joked, and seemed to
be as comfortable as if they had been swinging in the air all their lives. Many
were made dizzy and others sick, by the motion; but there was no help for them;
the swing must go for the usual time for the sake of those who were neither
dizzy nor sick, but expected, and had anything to the contrary been proposed
would have insisted, that, as they had paid for their pleasure, so they must
have it.
The last, but assuredly not the least, of the attractions
of Greenwich Fair are the dancing booths. By nine o’clock, they began to be
tolerably attended: by ten they were full; that is to say, as full as was
consistent with the requisite space for dancing. And yet, though thus as full as
they could conveniently bold, one of the parties interested stood at the door
inviting, or rather imploring, “ladies and gemmen,” to go in, expressly
assuring them that there was room for two or three hundred more. Most liberally
was the light fantastic toe tripped: the girls seemed in perfect ecstacies: they
would have danced themselves to death, if necessary; but it fortunately was not,
there being at least two of them to every one of the masculine gender. Dancing,
as they say in the provincial newspapers, when speaking of balls in the county
town, “was kept up to a late, or rather early hour.” The floor, or rather in
this case the ground, was not cleared until three in the morning; and even then,
the girls were loth to relinquish their occupation of it. On one side of the
booth, immediately adjoining the dancing-ground, were four or five boxes
constructed on the coffee-house principle, where the “partners” swigged
porter or sipped brandy-water, as the case might be, by way of refreshing
themselves after their dance. In some cases, the arms of the beau were to
be seen affectionately entwined around the neck of the belle, while in
others, all the indications and demonstrations of love were given by the young
ladies.
Though Greenwich Fair. properly so called, is confined to
the very narrow space before mentioned, it virtually extends for one or two
miles along the leading roads which communicate with the town. In saying this, I
do not so much mean the various stalls for the sale of sweetmeats and trinkets
which are scattered [-318-] so liberally about the suburbs, as to the number of idlers
and holiday people who are seen lounging about in all directions, but especially
at the doors of public-houses. I will venture to say, that there is scarcely a
public-house within two miles of Greenwich that cannot boast, provided the
weather be at all endurable, of its ten or twelve loungers about the door; some
of them drinking gin, others swilling porter, a third class smoking away at a
most furious rate, while many are doing all three together. Inside these
public-houses, again, there is hardly standing, far less sitting room. They are
crowded in every part with thirsty customers. You are quite at a loss whether
most to admire the talking or quaffing capabilities of the inmates. There is
nothing but noise and porter: all talk and all drink at once.
To be sure, an attempt is now and then made to introduce a
little harmony, in the way of a song; but the audience are anything but
harmonious in hearing it. A vocalist might just as soon hope to hush into
silence the roar of the ocean by the eloquence of his dulcet strains, as one
might expect to restore silence in a public-house audience, on Greenwich Fair
day, by the melody of his voice. Orpheus may have achieved the wonders ascribed
to him by the power of his melody, though I have always doubted it: he may have
tamed savage animals through means of bus musical talents; but I am quite
certain that all the modern Orpheuses in the world—if there be any Orpheuses
extant— would not silence or secure the attention of the biped savages who, at
Easter and Midsummer, patronize the public-houses in Greenwich and the
neighbourhood. They are a set of inveterately noisy beings: the unrestrained
exercise of their lungs seems indispensable to their enjoyment of the
jovialities of the occasion.
If what I have said, as to the distance .to which Greenwich
Fair extends itself, in the shape of crowded public-houses, be true as regards
the Woolwich and other roads, it is far more so as respects the road leading to
London. The whole of that road, indeed, from Southwark to Greenwich, may be said
to be only an arm of Greenwich Fair, in so far as the public-houses are
concerned. Though the distance be five miles, .they are all crowded with
customers, and each has as much business, in ~the porter and gin way, as it is
able to go through. I have, indeed, a strong suspicion, that many hundreds who
start from town with the full intention of visiting the Fair, and sharing its
fun and frolics, put a period to their journey—in other words, make a full
stop—before they have gone half the way. One is cold; he goes into a
public-house on the road to get a glass of spirits to warm him: a second is hot,
and he must have ditto to cool him: a third is thirsty, and he must have a pint
of porter to wet [-319-] his throat; while a fourth, more candid than either of the
others, says, according to the old story, that he must have the spirits or the
porter because he likes them. But whatever be the motive or the pretext which
induces the persons to whom I refer, to go into the public-houses if once they
have crossed its threshold, there is no getting them out again until it is time
to return home: there they enjoy, if enjoyment it may be called, their Greenwich
Fair. All the public-houses on the road from London to Greenwich were, at the
last Easter Fair, so much crammed with customers who had been on their way to
the fair, or were on their return from it, that the windows were literally
blocked up with them.
But not to attempt any further description of Greenwich
Fair, let me advert for a moment, in conclusion, to the moral tendencies of that
fair. I am sure the facts I have stated, and the efforts I have made to describe
the scenes which are to be witnessed during the three days at Easter, and the
three at Midsummer, on which the fair is held, must have satisfied every
reflecting mind that nothing could be more injurious to the morals of the
parties who take part in those scenes. They engender and foster habits of
idleness, frivolity, intemperance, and dissipation of every kind. They deaden
every delicate and amiable feeling, and inspire notions and lead to practices
which are altogether unworthy of rational beings. Thousands of youths of both
sexes have had to date their physical as well as moral ruin from attendance at
the fairs in the metropolis and its vicinity. Every one knows how difficult it
is to eradicate a taste for such scenes when once formed: it must be gratified
at all hazards. It never can be satiated: the more the craving after such things
is fed, the more urgent and large in its demands does it become. A love of drink
and debauchery, in all their varied forms, when once inspired, is very rarely to
be abated, much less annihilated, until both the mind and the constitution are
irretrievably ruined by its indulgence.
I am convinced there are thousands of both sexes who are
now living in the greatest destitution and wretchedness, who have to date their
misery from their attendance in early life on metropolitan and suburban fairs.
Some such instances have come under my own personal observation; nor could it be
otherwise. It is impossible for young persons, whose judgment is immature and
whose moral principles want vigour, to witness the scenes which are exhibited on
such occasions, and to take part in the transactions which take place, without
doing the morals of the individuals great injury. And while there is so much to
condemn in these fairs, there is not a single thing to commend. I do not know of
one rational amusement among all the exhi-[-320-]bitions which are to be witnessed. I
would be the last man to prohibit the youth of either sex from enjoying their
amusements and recreations; but surely there could be no difficulty in pointing
out the means of their rationally and innocently enjoying themselves at
particular seasons of the year, instead of their I patronizing the “shows”
and “sights” which are to be witnessed at metropolitan and suburban fairs.
The inference from all this is plain. The civil authorities
ought to put an end to such fairs. They are only the relics of a barbarous age,
and were established for the sake of an ignorant and brutalized people. They are
altogether unworthy the nineteenth century: they are especially unworthy a
civilized and Christian land. They are a positive reflection on the intelligence
and moral feeling of those in authority over us. To abolish them would be to
wipe out a foul blot which now stains the1 character of the country, and would
confer a lasting benefit I on the lower classes of the metropolitan community.
And I that benefit would soon be visible in the improved morals and ameliorated
condition of thousands of those classes. I am no advocate for the interposition
of the magistrate in the amusements of the people, as a general principle; but
where the obvious and admitted tendency of public amusements is of a most
immoral nature, then, indeed, a case is made out for magisterial interference.
In the mean time, and until the civil authorities shall see
it to be their duty to interfere, and put down the remaining fairs in the
metropolis and suburbs, let me impress on parents, masters, and mistresses, that
a great moral responsibility is incurred by them when they do not, in cases
where they could do it with effect, interpose the shield of their authority to
prevent their children or their servants from visiting such places. How parents,
who have any regard for the morals or well-being of their offspring, can allow
them to visit fairs, is to me altogether unaccountable. Even in the ease of
servants, masters and mistresses, who have any regard for the welfare of their
domestics, ought to discountenance, in the most marked manner, their visits to
such places.
[nb. grey numbers in brackets indicate page number, (ie. where new page begins), ed.] |